Saturday, January 6, 2018

"Communist" Councils In New Zealand. Saturday 6th January, 2018. The Epiphany of Our Lord




               – and the hidden Fabian Socialist 2006 “Draft Ten Year Plan” to
                 confiscate all freehold properties through rate rises and taxes 
                         A WARNING FOR THE WORLD
                                            by John D. Christian

         This ‘article’ is written in the global public interest, and may be freely reprinted or
           republished, in full or in part, for profit or not, by whomsoever wishes to use it.
                                                 © John Christian April 2006
 Before I outline the “Communist” basis of the New Zealand City, District and Regional Council draft Ten Year Plan policies (announced by most councils in March/April 2006), it is first necessary to provide a brief history of global “local government” in order to fully understand the real essence of what I write about. 

    Although the modern system of local and regional government can be directly traced back to Babylon, when in King Nebuchadnezzar’s time (605-562 B.C.), the city was divided up into ten distinct regions or districts ruled by princes, under whom were mayoral governors, captains, judges, treasurers, councilors and sheriffs – in modern times the system of local government that we have throughout the world is derived exclusively from the City of London Corporation.

City of London Corporation

    The City of London Corporation is a Masonic, private, independent, sovereign state occupying approximately one square mile within the heart of the greater London area inside the old Roman walls of London. 

    It either directly or indirectly, controls all mayors, councils, regional councils, multi-national and trans-national banks, corporations, judicial systems (through Old Bailey,  Temple Bar and the Royal Courts of Justice in London), the IMF, World Bank, Vatican Bank (through N. M. Rothschild & Sons London Italian subsidiary Torlonia), European Central  Bank,  United  States Federal Reserve (which  is privately owned and secretly controlled by eight British-controlled shareholding banks), the Bank for International Settlements in Switzerland  (which is  also  British-controlled and  oversees  all  of  the  Reserve Banks around the world including our own) and last but not least,  the communist European Union and communist United Nations Organization.

    The supreme ruler of the City is the Lord Mayor who is elected once a year and lives in the Mansion House. The City has a resident population of about 5,000 that rises to about two million during the week when people surge in and out each day to work. The financial centre of the world, it is often termed the ‘wealthiest square mile on earth.’ 

    The full title of the Square Mile’s governing body is the ‘Mayor, Aldermen and Commons of the City of London in Common Council Assembled.’ The Court of leadership consists of the Lord Mayor, 25 Aldermen and 130 Common Councilmen.

    All of the giant, largely Jewish international banks and corporations in the City of London that control the world are members of one or another of the Twelve Great Livery Companies domiciled in Guildhall (or the Hall of the City of London Corporation).

    As  the  result  of  a  ‘gentleman’s  agreement’  between  the  sovereign  and  the  City’s merchants and bankers made many hundreds of  years  ago, the Lord Mayor is officially head of the Corporation and is allowed to operate independently of the sovereign. However, the wealth of the world held in the Corporation ultimately is the sovereign’s, because, should the gentleman’s agreement break down, the sovereign has the power to “rescind” the Corporation’s independence. The Queen sometimes refers to the Corporation as “The Firm.”

    While ostensibly the power of the monarchy appears to be diminishing as the Queen voluntarily gives her Commonwealth countries their independence and they become republics chartered to the United Nations, and she actively works toward abolishing the sovereignty of Britain as the UK is broken up and divided into regions of the European Union – her City of London Corporation multi-national banks and corporations are quietly taking over the world. All of the big banks and companies in both New Zealand and Australia are either directly or indirectly City of London-controlled.

    In ancient times the City marshals and sheriffs were employed to ensure that all the “council” rates and taxes were paid to the City on behalf of the king. After the conquest of William the Conqueror in 1066, who first brought the Jewish bankers to London from France, the Jews developed written credit agreements for the king, (in French called “mort-gages” –  mort ‘death’ gage ‘bond’) and it was the marshal’s and sheriff’s  jobs to ensure that all the interest payments of these “death-bonds” were paid to the Jews on behalf of the king.

    During the reign of Richard I (the Lionhearted) after the serious downturn in the economy as the result of the cost and tax impositions of the Crusades, many farmers, business people and peasants had defaulted on their “mort-gages” throughout England. As the result, the Jews promptly commenced seizing the commoner’s property for not paying the interest, rates and taxes to the City and King. Subsequently, a rapid increase in hate against the “King’s Jews” was initiated. This led to the massacre of Jews at York in 1190. New York in America was later named by British Jewish immigrant bankers in memory of the event.

    For 100 years the commoner’s hate against the “King’s Jews” fermented until 1290, when, under pressure from the people, Edward III finally suspended the Mayoralty and reluctantly banished all Jews from his kingdom when 16,000 left England – and didn’t begin to return until around the reign of Elizabeth I (1558-1603) when the enormous power of  the City really began to accelerate with the opening of the world’s first stock exchange in London – and has continued unabated to the present day.

    While there have been rare occasions when the Lord Mayor and Commonalty of the City, as a result of their colossal wealth and  power have been  able to subtly  out-maneuver the monarch, as to their cost,  Richard II, Charles I  and James II were to learn to their fate – generally speaking this has been the exception rather than the rule. 

    Ultimately, whoever successfully rules must have the “will” of the people. Historically, in the City, many although certainly not all monarchs have ruled with the “will” of their subjects –  But rarely, if ever, have the bankers, rich barons or knights been respected in this position. More often than not they’ve been consistently hated. Even when monarchs have done a poor job, provided they have still had the “will” of the people, the wealthy bankers’ position has been extremely “perilous” to say the least.

    After forty years of misrule by Henry III, the Lord Mayor Thomas Fitzthomas (1261-1264) and the Aldermen defied the king. On this particular occasion the Lord Mayor ended up being thrown into the Tower where he died. Henry III vetoed nine Mayors in his long reign, and jailed another who died in prison.

    On one occasion the threat to the Lord Mayor’s massive wealth and  power  has  not come directly  from  the  monarch, but  from  the  people  themselves.  Mayor Nicholas Brembre (1383-1385) had been a king’s man during the peasant’s revolt, and was knighted by Richard II (similar to Sir Barry Curtis, Mayor of Manukau City in New Zealand today) for curbing the ambitions of his uncle, John of Gaunt. But Brembre had few friends among the common people having deposed the popular Mayor Adam Stable, and when he re-imposed the hated Poll Tax which had caused the revolt, the mob turned on him. He was given a mockery of a trial and was then hanged, drawn and quartered. 

    Understandably, therefore, from the time of Richard II most of the “Lord Mayors” in the City of London and others in the realm became very “cautious” and “hesitant” about any proposal which could be seen as an “unreasonable demand” to levy rates or taxes for the City and king.  However, today these events have all but been forgotten. 

    From the time of William the Conqueror in 1066 up to the time of the Reformation the City of London Corporation was Roman Catholic. (The modern global “company” and “corporate” business system that we know today grew out of the old Roman Catholic dioceses in England which were the world’s first “corporations”). 

    During the reigns of Henry VIII (1491-1547) and Elizabeth I (1558-1603) when the Church of England, knights and barons took over the assets of the Roman Catholic Church in England, the City then became Protestant. 

    Gradually, as the people of England apostatized and turned away from the Protestant King James Bible, and Christianity in general, both Roman Catholic and Protestant, in the late 1800’s the City and Monarchy became rabidly Socialist.

The Beginning of Socialism in London

    The religion of Socialism is based primarily on the teachings of the pagan Greek philosopher and writer Plato, and especially his book The Republic, in which 400 years before the time of Christ he dreamed of a “World Republic” headed not by a president, but by a royal “world philosopher king” or “prince” (like himself of course!). Both Karl Marx and Hitler were great students of Plato. It is only inevitable that the planned reformed United Nations and EU will one day be headed by this “Philosopher Prince.”

    Socialism officially first began in 1880 in London when H. M. Hyndman founded the Rose Street Club which was dedicated to the destruction of Christianity in England.

    In 1884 the group changed its name and came to be called the Social Democratic Federation. Its early members deceptively called themselves “Christian Socialists.” Later the group’s membership included the Jew, Karl Marx’s daughter, Eleanor Marx and her husband Professor Aveling.  

 Behind the scenes  the  group  was largely controlled by Engels, Karl Marx’s partner. Because Hyndman would not obey the orders of Engels, Eleanor Marx and her husband split off with William Morris the poet and others and started an opposition group which they called the Socialist League.

    On January 4, 1884, members and past members of the Social Democratic Federation, the Socialist League and others founded the Fabian Society. 


Fabian Society


    The first meeting of the Fabian Society was held at the home of Mr. E. R. Pease, a member of the London Stock Exchange. Two of the leading members were George Bernard Shaw and Sidney Webb. Other early members were Eleanor Marx, theosophist and occultist Annie Besant, and author H. G. Wells.      


    The name of the society was suggested by the Spiritualist, Frank Podmore, who named it after the brilliant, elderly, third century Roman general, censor and consul, Quintus Fabius (Maximus Verrucosus) (303-203 BC) who was made a dictator in 221-217 BC and, with his small band of fighting guerillas and superior cunning, successfully defended Rome by defeating Hannibal’s much bigger and mighty  Carthaginian  army  through “gradualism” and  terrorism” during the time of the second Punic War.  


    Initially he kept to the hills and cunningly hampered the enemy’s progress by cutting off their food and supply lines with “delaying tactics” until Rome could assemble enough men to defend the city successfully. During the war, his slow, “gradual,” delaying tactics were greatly disapproved of by his soldiers and the civilians and earned him the name of ‘Cunctator’ – the ‘Delayer.’ But later, after the triumph, his skill and wisdom was highly appreciated. He died in his 100th year in 203 BC.

    Fabian Socialism is a  “mixture” of Fascism, Nazism, Marxism and Communism  all bundled together. However, it is much more deadly because it is much more clever and subtle. The only difference between Fabian Socialism and Communism is that Communists take your house by directly sending in the “secret police” to knock your front door down – Fabian Socialists do it much more subtly and cleverly – by “gradually” taking your individual rights away, by “gradually” increasing property taxes and rates, and finally, when you can’t pay them, they send in their regional “council tax inspectors” to take your house away – but the end result is the same. 


    British PM Tony Blair and President George Bush Junior’s globalist “war on terror” is a classic Fabian Socialist strategy.


    The philosophy of the Fabian Society was written in 1887 and included the statement: “The Fabian Society acknowledges the principal tenet of Marxism … the abolition of private property … etc.” (of course this does not apply to the elect oligarchy at the top who end up owning the lot!). 


    Sidney and Beatrice Webb published a book of 1143 pages in defense of Bolshevism. It was entitled Soviet Communism: A New Civilization. In April 1952 the Webbs were exposed before a US Senate Committee on the Judiciary when Soviet Colonel I. M. Bogolepov, a former Red Army officer, stated that the entire text had been prepared by himself in the Soviet Foreign Office.

    Appropriately, the defiant coat of arms of the Fabian Society (commissioned by author/playwright co-founder George Bernard Shaw) today (now archived) is a “wolf in sheep’s clothing.” Until recently it also appeared on the Fabian glass window (now removed) in the Beatrice Webb House at Dorking, Surrey.

Wolf in sheep’s clothing

The subversive nature of the Fabian project is illustrated by the Fabian Window, a stained-glass composition showing Fabian leaders Edward R. Pease, Sidney Webb and Bernard Shaw (in the green coat) forging a new world out of the old, while other Fabians kneel worshipfully before a stack of Fabian writings.

The window carries the logo: “Remould it [the World] nearer to the heart’s desire,” the last line from a quatrain by the medieval Iranian poet Omar Khayyam which reads: “Dear love, couldst thou and I with fate conspire/To grasp this sorry scheme of things entire,/Would we not shatter it to bits, and then/Remould it nearer to the heart’s desire!” and which expresses the Fabians’ plan to destroy and reconstruct society along Fabian lines.


The Fabian Window was commissioned by Shaw in 1910 and is currently located at the London School of Economics. Though its theme purports to be humorous, the fact is that, as admitted by Bernard Shaw, humour or what he described as “freely laughing at ourselves” was a distinguishing habit of the Fabians (Pease, p. 34). In fact, humour was a tactic used by Fabians to conceal the deadly earnest of their intentions.

Indeed, there is nothing humorous about a semi-secret organisation working to destroy Western civilisation. Moreover, the Fabian Window is undeniably symbolic and as such it is based on fact: despite claims to being “scientific,” Socialism proved to be riddled with internal inconsistencies and contradictions rendering commitment to its tenets a matter of faith rather than reason.


As observed by the economist P. T. Bauer, Socialism turned out to be a kind of faith-based messianic religion that promised salvation on earth (Bauer, p. 176). In the Fabian case, making Socialism (or Fabianism) into a quasi-religious movement was a conscious objective of the Fabian leadership as shown by Shaw’s comments to the effect that the Fabians “must make a religion of Socialism” (Henderson, p. 488). Other Fabian leaders similarly spoke of Socialism as a “new social religion”. Thus, the Fabians’ adulatory attitude towards Fabian writings depicted in the Window accurately portrays the cult-like nature of Socialism in general and of Fabian Socialism, in particular.


The window also shows, in the background (above the globe), the Fabian “coat-of-arms” consisting of a wolf wearing a sheepskin and bearing a red standard with the initials “F.S.” Again, this symbolism is undeniably based on the fact of the Fabian tactic of “permeation” and of achieving its ends by stealth.


Finally, the Society’s Iranian logo may well be a hidden reference to the reconstruction of the world order in line with international oil interests. The Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (later British Petroleum) was among the corporate members of the Royal Institute of International Affairs a.k.a. Chatham House (King-Hall, p. 140), an organisation co-founded by members of the Fabian Society and the Society has retained close links to oil interests (see below). 



Today the Fabian Society is among other things the intellectual wing of the British Labour Party.  Before Tony Blair became British Prime Minister in May 1997, he was chairman of the Fabian Society. 


    Since the 1997 British general election there have been around 200 Fabian MP’s in the House of Commons, some of whom have formed almost entire Labour Cabinets including Gordon Brown, Robin Cook, Jack Straw, David Blunkett, Peter Hain, Patricia Hewitt, John Reid, Ruth Kelly, Alan Milburn, and Clare Short. Headed by Tony Blair, Fabians now dominate the entire British government. They are resident in all parties and sit on all important select committees, commissions and organizations allied to the government. A good web-site on the subject is: 


    The Fabian Society literally controls the European Union. German-born Gisela Stuart, the Labour MP for Birmingham Edgbaston since 1997, and member of the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee, was one of two House of Commons’  Representatives  on   the   European   Convention  and   a   member  of   the Presidium of the Convention on the Future of Europe. The Presidium was the drafting body that created the draft Constitution for Europe. In her book, The Making of Europe’s Constitution, published in December 2003 by the Fabian Society, p. 20-21  Gisela writes:


    “In the early months, the  Presidium  members  would  meet  in  a  small  room  in  the Justus    


Lipsius Building some fifteen minute walk  from  the  European  Parliament.  Attendance was limited to the thirteen members, the Secretary General Sir John Kerr, his deputy and the press officer. Sir John Kerr, a former Permanent Secretary of the British Foreign Office, conducted the proceedings inside the Presidium and in the plenary sessions of the Convention with deft diplomatic skill as might be expected from someone who John Major called ‘Machiavelli’ in his autobiography. The best description of his talents I heard was: ‘When Kerr comes up to you and asks for the time, you wonder why me and why now?’ …


    On several occasions, we would retreat to the Val Duchess – a small palace used by the Belgian foreign minister. It was at one of the dinners at Val Duchess that the skeleton of the draft constitution was given to members of the presidium in sealed brown envelopes the weekend before the public presentation. We were not allowed to take the documents away with us. Just precisely who drafted the skeleton, and when, is still unclear to me, but I gather much of the work was done by Valery Giscard d’Estaing and Sir John Kerr over the summer. There was little time for informed discussion, and even less scope for changes to be made.”


     Today the Labour Parties in both New Zealand and Australia are closely affiliated to the Fabian Society in London.


    When Australian Labour Party Prime Minister Bob Hawke (a Rhodes Scholar), was guest of honour at the Fabian Society’s Centenary Commemoration Dinner in Melbourne on May 18, 1984, he said:


    “… I gladly acknowledge the debt of my own government to Fabianism. Earlier I dealt at some length with the principle of the inevitability of ‘gradualness.’ There is another important idea, a method more than a principle – which becomes closely associated with Fabianism. Sydney Webb called it ‘permeation.’ Today it would be called ‘consensus.’


    Webb put it this way. Most reformers think that all they have to do in a political democracy is to obtain a majority. This is a profound mistake. What has to be changed is not only the vote that is cast, but also the mental climate in which Parliament and Government both live and work. That I find to be an accurate description of the approach I and my colleagues have tried to bring to the affairs of the nation in our first term of office.”


    In June 2001, at the Federal Government joint standing committee on treaties inquiry into whether Australia should support a statute of the UN International Criminal Court which would affect the “sovereignty” of all Australians, when criticized by an Australian patriotic group, Labour Party Senator Chris Schacht, sarcastically exclaimed he had been a member of the Fabian Society for 20 years – and further, said; “You probably were not aware that us Fabians have taken over the CIA, KGB, M15, ASIO  (Australian Security Intelligence Organization), IMF, the World Bank and many other organizations.”


     That is why Tony Blair, as part of the 2006 Commonwealth Games Closing Celebrations in Melbourne on March 26, was also invited by Labour officials and business leaders to speak to the Australian Parliament in Canberra on March 27 about his Fabian “war against terror,” and “intelligence matters” where he said; “The war against terror was as much a battle about values as it was about arms.” – and why, after the Australian Government meeting, he  flew directly to New Zealand  on  March 28  to speak about the same subject at a meeting in the Auckland Town Hall, hosted by the New Zealand Labour Party Prime Minister, Helen Clark, and the Auckland Regional Chamber of Commerce and Industry – after which he participated (by video-link) in the International Climate Change Conference in Wellington on March 29, and later discussed with  Prime Minister Helen Clark his (“Fabian Society”) “initiative to set up a unit in the NZ public  service  to  enable   their  respective  Labour  Governments  to  co-operate  more closely on policy development” (NZ Herald, March 28, 2006 pg. A3) and on “security – intelligence matters” as communist China  is brought into the fold.


    In the last century, members of the British Fabian Society dynastic banking families in the City of London financed the Communist takeover of  Russia.  Trotsky, in his biography, refers to some of the loans from these British financiers going back as far as 1907. By 1917 the major subsidies and funding for the Bolshevik Revolution were coordinated and arranged by Sir George Buchanan and Lord Alfred Milner. The Communist system in Russia was a “British experiment” designed ultimately to become the Fabian Socialist model for the British takeover of the world through the UN and EU.

Fabian Society “Five Year Plan”

    The British plan to take over the world and bring in a “New World Order” began with the teachings of John Ruskin and Cecil Rhodes at Oxford University. 


    Rhodes in one of his wills in 1877 left his vast fortune to Lord Nathan Rothschild as trustee to set up the Rhodes Scholarship Program at Oxford to indoctrinate promising young graduates for the purpose, and also establish a secret society for leading business and banking leaders around the world who would work for the City to bring in their Socialist world government. 


    Rothschild appointed Lord Alfred Milner to implement the plan. At first the society was called Milner’s Kindergarten then in 1909 it came to be called the RoundTable. It was to work closely with the London School of Economics founded in 1894 by Fabian Socialist leader Sidney Webb (Lord Passfield). Today former Rhodes Scholars (such as Bill Clinton), Fabian Business RoundTable members, and graduates from the London School of Economics (the primary Fabian Socialist training school in the world) dominate the global banking, business and political systems in every country.


    The British Fabian Society plan to takeover the world by the City of London financial community was first published in a book entitled All These Things by a New Zealand author and journalist, A. N. Field. The book was first published in 1936 by Omni Publications in the United States (and censored in New Zealand).


    The document, called “Freedom and Planning” was secretly circulated in 1932 by the inner councils of the members of the Political Economic Plan, otherwise known as “P.E.P.” in London. The then chairman of the organization was a City of London Jew, Israel Moses Sieff, who was the reputed author of the plan. The headquarters of P.E.P. were at 16 Queen Anne’s Gate, London. Mr. Sieff was also chairman and financier of Marks and Spencer’s chain stores and was vice-president of the British Zionist Society.


    Centered around City of London Jewry’s international financiers in the Bank of England subsidiary, the Bankers Industrial Development Company, the essence of the document “Freedom and Planning” was (and still is) to gradually “Sovietize” the world based on their “Five Year Plan” inaugurated in Moscow in 1927-28 in the Soviet Union.


    Basically the plan involved the subtle transfer of the entire productive capacity of each country throughout the world into a series of  great  “State-owned” departments which would then be “corporatized”, then  “privatized” to City of  London Corporation, international banks and corporations which they control.


    Individual property ownership would be severely restricted, with most of the land, sea, fisheries, rivers, lakes, ports, railways, communications, media, roads, electricity, energy, food, water, waste management, housing, farms, commercial property, schools, hospitals, police, social welfare, Inland Revenue etc. transferred into statutory corporations, companies or land  trusts which indirectly would be owned by City of London banks. The “peasants” would still be allowed to own their own clothes, and small assets like furniture, cars and boats etc., but the main assets of each country would be owned by their multi-national corporations and banks. In essence the City of London Corporation would become the “One World Earth Corporation” and would privately own the world.   


    Similar to the experiment carried out in the in the USSR, the whole world would eventually be transferred  into  a  Communist  “United  Nations”  World  Soviet  Socialist  Republic, where  each country would be “regionalized” and ruled through “Regional Councils” through a United Nations dictatorship called a “Parliamentary Assembly” which would be just another name for a Soviet “Central Committee” – and all independent, sovereign, national governments would be totally abolished.

Fabian Society Privatization of the World

    As the result of the P.E.P. Plan originally formulated in 1932, right now every country’s “State assets” (owned in trust by the State on behalf of the people) are being frantically “privatized” by City of London-controlled banks and corporations primarily under the directions of two leading Fabian Socialist writers – Sir Roger Douglas and John Redwood. 


    Sir Roger Douglas’s book Unfinished Business and John Redwood’s book Public Enterprise in Crisis are the primary handbooks being used by central and local government finance ministers and officers all around the world to sell off each nation’s “family silver” and State assets – with the more “sensitive” public assets being transferred into Fascist-type Public-Private Partnerships (PPP’s) which are designed to make the public masses and peasantry “think” that they have some degree of control – when in reality they have none as the real ownership of the assets are held  by the City of London  banks  and  corporations  who  fund  them.  


    Until  relatively recently, John Redwood was head of N. M. Rothschild & Sons London global Overseas Privatization Unit that is coordinating the entire global privatization process. Sir Roger has been contracted as a consultant by City of London Banks, the World Bank and others to advise on national privatization programs as well. 


Fabian Society “Regionalization” of the World through

UN and EU Control of Regional and City Councils

    All of the countries in the world currently are being “regionalized.” Presently, for example, the whole of the United States is being “regionalized” and the EU Committee of the Regions based in Brussels, is “regionalizing” every country in the European Union.


    As the result of this radical “regionalization” process, Britain has now already been effectively abolished, having been divided up into 9 separate regions of the EU, plus Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. This cunning process, which is being “gradually” implemented to destroy the power of the central national government in each country is commonly being referred to as “Devolution” by the Queen and Fabian Society.     


    Unlike the rest of the autonomous regions in the UK which, like most of the other regions in the EU that have become virtually powerless through their representation in the European Parliament which is now only a “talking shop”, the City of London Corporation as a separate region by itself within the Union now rules it. This is because all of the Commissioners are appointed (not elected) to the European Commission by City of London-controlled business leaders and bankers in their respective countries.


    Right now throughout the UK all city councils and regional councils are dramatically increasing their rate demand on their constituent’s properties, while at the same time they are quickly expanding their debt levels for unaffordable capital works programs via loans from City of London banks – which policies are deliberately intended to prepare for  the  councils’  “privatization”  whilst  transferring  the  local   government  in each country to “regional super-councils” – which ultimately will become or be controlled by “Regional Parliamentary Assemblies,” identical to the old structure in the former Soviet  Union – which at first regionalized then abolished the national governments before they set up their republican socialist police state.

 “Sovietization” of Local Government in New Zealand

    In New Zealand, the blatant UN “Sovietization” of the entire country was implemented by the Hon. Dr. Michael Bassett, Minister of Local Government, through the Local Government Amendment Act (No.2) in 1989. This radical act reduced more than 600 different local authorities throughout the country to 94: 13 regional councils, 74 district or city councils and seven special authorities.


    This new structure of local government deftly created by the act divided the whole country up into 14 “Soviet-styled” super-regions governed by 13 regional councils and a district council (with the Gisborne Region being unique in that its district council was also to become the regional council for that area.).


    Under the 1989 Act, the district and city councils were designed to continue to provide essential services such as water supply, roads, sewage disposal and rubbish collection (which all ultimately would be “privatized” or transferred into “Public-Private-Partnerships (PPP’s) which would finally end up being foreign-owned) and the regional councils would take over many of the responsibilities performed in the past by many special purpose authorities formerly carried out by such agencies as catchment boards, harbor boards, pest and noxious plant authorities etc. 


    Ultimately, this devious plan is to transfer many of the Central Government tasks and responsibilities to regional councils as well, which will be further subtly rationalized to become or be controlled by “Sovietized” Regional Development Agencies and Regional Parliamentary Assemblies – to rule their unwary serfs and peasants under strict Communist United Nations and Marxist EU socialist law. These processes are now well advanced and are almost complete in Britain, and are accelerating in all other countries, including the United States. One could say that the Fabian Socialist global “cake is about 95% baked!”


Communist “Sustainable Development” 

    In 1992 at the “communist” United Nations Conference on the Environment and Development (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, co-chaired by former Soviet Union President  Mikhail Gorbachev and N. M. Rothschild-London  agent Canadian billionaire Maurice Strong, the UN unveiled a radical environmental philosophical agenda which “inverted” the traditional values reflected in the Bible, Magna Carta and US Constitution (which put man under God at the head of his creation and dominion i.e. a man’s rights were to have superiority over those of animals, fish, plants, trees and forests etc.). At the Earth Summit in Rio, an old pagan concept was introduced which “inverted” all of our existing, constitutional, democratic, personal and property rights and values espoused by Christianity – and transferred them to the environment and the religion of mother-earth Gaia worship. In this religion, a tree becomes more valuable than a human being –  A rare bird more valuable than a hospital. 


    This United Nations program of action unveiled in Rio was called Agenda 21. It is 300 pages long and is very complex. Primarily it is designed to be implemented with other radical UN documents such as the Global Biodiversity Assessment (1100 pages), promoted by the UN Conference on Human Settlements, Habitat II. The first Habitat Conference was held in 1974 and specifically identified private property ownership as a threat to the peace and equality of the environment. It proposed to revolutionize the development of the land and cities of each country under strict “Soviet-style” environmental guidelines, called “Sustainable Development.”


    The UN’s communist secret agenda through “environmentalism” and “sustainable development” is very cunning and has deceived a lot of well-meaning people. Most people genuinely want to protect the environment and ensure that the earth’s resources are “sustainable” for future generations there is no doubt. But the communist goal of “sustainable development” and “environmentalism” has absolutely nothing to do with protecting the environment or sustainability – it is all about abolition of property rights, and ultimately, collectivization of housing and farms under corporate State control. 


    Under this system, farmers’ and property owners’ rights would be effectively extinguished and overridden by strict Environmental and Sustainable Development resource consents and laws.  They would be told where they could farm, what “sustainable” land they could “develop,” (sustainable development) what trees they could plant or cut down, what fertilizer if any they could apply, and they would need “consents” and licenses for everything under the sun. City dwellers would be in the same dire predicament, and have their homes confiscated, or they’d be severely fined,  if they cut down a heritage tree, washed their car, boat or dishes using detergent, or used the privatized corporation’s water when they shouldn’t, especially if they were nabbed under their friendly “Neighborhood Watch Scheme,” which scheme, coincidentally, was first implemented in the Soviet Union. Socialism is very subtle.


    The penalty for cutting a tree down without the appropriate government consent would become worse than murder. Not only would you have to license your dog, to own a dog you would have to be licensed too. Farmers would need to be licensed to operate their collectivized farms, spray weeds, care for cattle and drive their tractors under new Soviet-styled “health and safety” laws. All tradesmen and professional workers would have to be accredited and licensed, as would all Christian pastors and churches, and any other persons or institutions that could be likely to criticize their Soviet bosses.  


    All potential young parents would need to have a license to have children, and if there was any family genetic weakness of some sort in their state-controlled doctor’s medical records, no license would be given. In the end you would need a license or permit to take your boat on a lake, take your kid fishing off a wharf, or travel between towns or cities – In other words – full-blown Marxism.


    The United Nations policy of “Sustainable Development” introduced in 1992 at the UNCED at Rio de Janeiro, and implemented   through Habitat II and the UN World Commission on Environment and Development – is taken directly from the USSR Constitution, chapter 2, article 18, which reads:


    “In the interests of the present and future generations, the necessary steps are taken in the USSR to protect and make scientific, rational use of the land and its mineral and water resources, and the plant and animal kingdoms to preserve the purity of air and water, ensure reproduction of natural wealth, and improve the human environment.”


     National Party Prime Minister, Jim Bolger, attended the UN Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and signed on behalf of New Zealand to commit the country to Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development.  Labour Party Prime Minister Helen Clark attended the follow-up summit in Johannesburg August 26 – September 4 2002 aptly called the “World Summit for Sustainable Development,” where she attended the head of state sessions. The summit has since been nicknamed “Rio+10 because it marked the 10th anniversary of the first Earth Summit at Rio. NZ Environment Minister Marion Hobbs led a 35-strong delegation to the giant summit, and was one of five vice-presidents nominated by the UN to lead the summit comprised of about 45,000 delegates. 


    Not only was N. M. Rothschild agent, Maurice Strong, Secretary-General of the UN 1992 Rio Earth Summit, he personally worked with UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan to appoint three of his own Earth Charter Commissioners to the 12-man  advisory panel of the Johannesburg Summit. 

World Conservation Bank

    In September 1987, the 4th World Wilderness Congress was held in Denver, Colorado, USA, which established the World Conservation Bank. The congress was set up by none other than London’s (late) Baron Edmond de Rothschild, chairman of Banque Privee Edmond de Rothschild, Geneva, Switzerland, and one of the trustees of the International Wilderness Foundation that sponsored the conference. 


    Approximately 1500 of the world’s most powerful bankers and leaders attended the congress, which was chaired by Rothschild agent and Canadian multibillionaire, Maurice Strong. At the congress, Edmond de Rothschild designated eminent financier I. Michael Sweatman to be the first president of the World Conservation Bank. Mr. Sweatman wrote the forward of the banks charter.


    Leading insiders of the biggest banks and UN agencies in the world were present, including Maurice Strong “Mr. Sustainable,” David Rockefeller head of the Chase Manhattan Bank “Mr. Development” and Mr. David Ruckleshaus head of the UN Environmental Protection Agency “Mr. Environment” – of course!  


    The World Conservation Bank (or an equivalent of it) is destined to become the final World Bank and the “de-coupling mechanism” for City of London parent banks to take over the assets of every country of the world. The essence of their secret plan is this: After an orchestrated period of global financial chaos triggered by a major war in the Middle East or man-made state of emergency or natural disaster, in which most of the world’s banks will be deliberately collapsed in the process, (wiping everybody’s savings out in the crash), key City of London banking parent creditors, are going to takeover all the “mort-gages” (death-bonds) and assets of the world, and transfer them to the World Conservation Bank (or its equivalent). The plan is very esoteric and cunning, and very difficult for most to understand.   


    Already most government treasury departments are preparing for such an event. As part of the preparation for this momentous event, all of the world’s individual currencies are to be merged into two or three major currency groups, two of which are to be the euro and the U.S. dollar. Finally, these currencies are to be replaced with the World Conservation Bank’s (or equivalent) new electronic global currency, “World Currency Unit” or “Earth Dollar” This new currency is deceptively to be issued against the collateral of 34 per cent of the Earth’s surface that is presently being transferred into huge UN Heritage Parks and Conservation areas in every country across the globe, under the crafty deception of “Sustainable Development.” In short, the biggest banking conspiracy and deception ever to face mankind! 


    George W. Hunt, (95 Camino Basque, Boulder, Colorado 80302, U.S.A.), a US businessman, attended the Congress and produced a video about it exposing their wicked and incredibly deceptive plans. On his video he plays excerpts of key speeches recorded at the congress. One such speech was made by David Lang, a leading US financier and close personal friend and business partner of Maurice Strong, who said:


    “When the auditor finally gets his hands into the balance sheet, I suggest therefore that this be sold not through a democratic process. That would take too long and devour far too much of the funds to educate the cannon fodder unfortunately which populates the earth. We have to take an almost elitist program that we can see beyond our swollen bellies and look to the future in time frames and in results – which are not easily understood or which can be, with intellectual honesty, be reduced down to some sort of simplistic definition.”


  CANNON-FODDER– is what these leading, arrogant, banking conspirators of the UN “Sustainable Development,” “Smart-Growth,” and World Conservation policies think of the world general population – including all New Zealanders.


    THESE are the wicked men that all the millions and millions of naïve local / central government politicians and business leaders throughout the world are now following.


    The New Zealand government has already met its commitment and transferred over 34 per cent of the entire country’s land area into UN Heritage Areas and Conservation Parks under this deceptive plan. New Zealanders need to wake up and wake up fast.

Communist “Smart-Growth”

    The main business facilitators and organizations of the UN Sustainable Development policies in the Asia-Pacific Region are the Pacific Rim Institute of Sustainable Management, the NZ Business Council for Sustainable Development and the Melbourne-based Sustainable Investment Research Group (SIRIS). Equity in this group, SIRIS, coincidentally, is held by IOOF Funds Management and broking house JBWere – that provide research for N.M. Rothschild & Sons’ Ethical Share Trust based in London.


    The 1995 session the United Nations General Assembly passed a number of rules. Rule 61, 62 and 63 gave local government, civil organizations and private citizens the right to participate directly in the development and implementation of these documents.


    Directed by the IMF, World Bank, UN, and Prince of Wales International Business Leaders Forum, the philosophy of “sustainable development” basically says that there     


are plainly too many people on planet earth and there are not enough resources to go around. What we need to do is urgently reduce the population, preserve, conserve, and “ration” the remaining resources – and that the United Nations is the only body that can do it. 


    The World Bank already has a huge statistical database on countries and individuals – what they produce and what resources they consume, water, energy, food, raw materials, heat, waste, health, social services etc. If the net figure is a plus, they are considered to be good productive world citizens. If it is a negative, they are in line for liquidation. These are basically all the same old Socialist/Communist ideas as the “Marxist/Leninist philosophy” and “planned economy” that permeated the old Soviet Union.


    In 1992 at Rio, another key “Soviet-styled” strategy proposed by the Agenda 21   Program of Action from the United Nations Conference on the Environment and Development (UNCED) was “Smart-Growth.” 


    This agenda can be found in a UN companion book called Global Biodiversity Assessment published by Cambridge University Press. It proposes to model all the cities in the world on the Israel Moses Seif P.E.P plan and the “planned” economic system of development used by Lenin and Stalin under the old Communist Soviet system of local government.    


    The UN “Smart-Growth” legislation in the United States was first passed in the  State of Maryland in March 1997. Since then, it has been gradually introduced by city and district councils all around the world – including our own here in New Zealand. Of course, rarely if ever will you hear of the policy coming from a foul brood of UN international bankers. While virtually all of the general public are largely oblivious of this fact, usually individual councils will be happy to credit themselves as authors of the plans. 

Bribery of Local Government Politicians

    Based on a City of London corporate banking formula, a policy to provide for “more appropriate rates of remuneration for council members” was planned for in the Local Government Act (No.2) 1989. This was essentially recommended to effectively “bribe” City Council, District Council, Regional Council and Community Board members throughout New Zealand, particularly in the bigger councils, to implement the Fabian Socialist policies from the Central Government and Treasury which aimed to dramatically increase property rates and taxes in the future, whether ratepayers or constituents agreed with them or not.


    Subsequently, these sweeping remuneration changes were proposed by the politically appointed Higher Salaries Commission on April 2002 increasing Auckland Mayor John Banks annual salary from $47,007 to $146,107, a pay rise of $99,100,  Manukau Mayor Sir Barry Curtis a pay rise of $35,111, Hamilton Mayor David Braithwaite a pay rise of $27,381, Auckland Regional Council Chairwoman Gwen Bull a pay rise $37,872 and Tauranga Mayor Jan Beange a pay rise of $9461. 


    Since April 2002, it is not just a coincidence that these are precisely the councils that have been amongst the biggest culprits that have demanded the most onerous rates rises from their struggling citizens. 


    For example, Tauranga City’s proposed average rate rise for the 2006-2007 year was leveled at 16.3 per cent (when inflation, wage rises, benefits, pensions etc. and the change in the consumer price index was running at about 3 per cent). 

    Even a five year old kindergarten child knows that this huge disparity is entirely unfair and “unsustainable” for the majority of their citizens, yet these highly over-paid Lord Mayors, Councilors and UN vassals of the realm have the cheek and audacity to call their plans “Smart-Growth” and “Sustainable Development.” 


Pauperization of Pensioners and the Middle Class

    Just as there is a “close relationship” between the remuneration rises of leading local body politicians with the overall level of council rate-rise demand, so there is a “close relationship” between the level of council rate-rise impositions and the financial status of people living in each council ward or constituency. The Fabian bankers already “own” the properties held by ratepayers with a “mort-gage” on them. This includes all private homes, farms, businesses and commercial property, local and central government debt. All young people with student loans and welfare beneficiary groups also come under this category. By and large central bankers believe this group is not a worry as they are already under their strict control and firmly in their grip through welfare dependency or mort-gage “death-bond” fealty. 


    But the one group that Fabian Socialists hate the most are the “freeholdproperty-owners. Hence, this group, more often than not, is the “middle class” that is predominantly comprised of middle-aged citizens and more particularly pensioners who are generally the most asset-rich. As a result of this phenomenon all global residential property taxation and ratepayer tax policies are now being subtly targeted against these particular groups to confiscate all their properties. 


    Essentially the Fabian City of London banks envisage this to be achieved through a variety of measures including onerous council rate-rises, capital gains taxes on more expensive residential properties, stamp duties, the introduction of Home Equity Release Loans (usually for over-60’s), aged health care, social welfare and superannuation programs that debit the cost from the value of recipient property estates, the introduction of Residential Equity Taxes and attacks against Family Trusts.   


    Since council taxes were introduced in Britain in 1993, the average council bill has increased by 121 per cent – but it has soared by 149 per cent in areas which have a lot of  older residents. 


    Chichester is the worst offender with a 173 per cent increase. The average bill in the West Sussex town, where 23 per cent of residents are retired, has jumped from £456 in 1993-1994 to £1,244 for 2005-2006. In the Dorset coastal town of Christchurch, where pensioners make up 30 per cent of the population, the bills have soared by 171 per cent from £441 to £1,193. 


    Of the 20 local councils in England with the highest numbers of pensioners, 18 have seen their bills rise faster than average over the past 12 years, according to the research by Halifax Bank. (Daily Mail, Saturday, November 26, 2005).  


    The targeting and planning of these exorbitant rate rises comes not primarily from local councils, but from Central Government and Treasury officials through the Minister of Local Government and the Department of Internal Affairs acting under various OECD or UN agency guidelines.

Borrowing Powers of Councils and the Stealing of Ratepayer’s Properties

    Early in 1994 submissions were called for on Department of Internal Affairs plans to repeal the 1956 Local Authority Loans Act and for new borrowing powers to be placed in the 1974 Local Government Act.


    Up  to  1994,  most  local   authority  borrowing   had  to  be  approved  by  the  Local     


 Authorities Loans Board which ensured that all long-term borrowing by councils for a Capital work or asset had to be secured by future rates revenue. Since some loans were exempted from the control and monitoring of the Board, such as redemption loans, loans up to $50 million for local authorities with populations more than 20,000, and loans up to $15 million for local authorities with populations of less than 20,000, it was proposed that the Local Authorities Loans Board should effectively become redundant – and new laws should be implemented which would allow all local authorities to manage their financial costs  and  risks  themselves  with  details  of  their  proposed  borrowing programs included in their annual plans. By 1997 councils were allowed to borrow up to 15 per cent of their city’s land value. By June 1997, for example, Manukau City Council’s debt was 11.5 per cent of the city’s land value.


    Ultimately, what these Fabian, City of London banking despots want is to change the system of valuing each nation’s property from “land value” to “capital value” or “rental value” (yes, they want both your land and your house) – then through their deputized local government “Soviet Commissars,” introduce a Five or Ten Year Plan to “gradually” keep increasing the maximum threshold that limits the level of local government borrowing as a percentage of the total capital value of the city or region – up to a level that during a planned global economic crisis and downturn, they can cause the councils to default, and implement draconian rate rises  on  unwary  ratepayers  and     the general peasantry – and finally implement the Israel Moses Sieff and Fabian Society’s global plan to confiscate everybody’s properties as they previously did under their Five Year Plan in the Soviet Union.

    Hence, the “Ten Year Plan” now being introduced by all councils throughout New Zealand comes not from their own naïve inspiration – but under the direct Fabian Socialist banking fraternity’s devious plan inserted into Section 93 of the New Zealand Local Government Act 2002 – by political vassals of the treasury and New Zealand Parliament, which is now become no more than  a  rudimentary  “talking shop” of low-level office clerks of international City of London UN bankers.

London School of Economics

    The London School of Economics in London was founded on the initiative of Fabian Socialist leader Sidney Webb (Lord Passfield). 


    The funding for the early development of the school was provided by a handsome endowment under the Will of Sir Earnest Cassel (nickname ‘Windsor Cassel’), the German Jewish close friend and financial advisor of King Edward VII, who was instrumental with Jacob Schiff, head of Kuhn, Loeb and Company, New York, with Paul Warburg, a partner in the firm, in establishing the United States Federal Reserve Board in 1913 – which now controls the entire banking system in America.


    Professor J. H. Morgan, K.C., in the Quarterly Review of January 1929, said he once asked Lord Haldane, a long time friend of Sidney Webb why the endowment had been given and Lord Haldane replied: “Our object is to make this institution a place to raise and train the bureaucracy of the future Socialist State” – and they certainly have! 


    Now both the New Zealand and Australian government bureaucracies are brimming full of individuals who have been specifically trained in this college or at Oxford as Rhodes Scholars.  


Parliamentarians for World Order:

(now called: Parliamentarians for Global Action)


    Following a meeting at Ashville in North Carolina in February 1947 a Fabian front organization going under the name United World Federalists was established under the leadership and funding of two City of London  banking  agents,  Norman  Cousins  and James Paul Warburg. 


    Both men were members of the US Council of Foreign Relations, the American sub-branch of the immensely powerful Royal Institute of International Affairs (recently renamed Chatham House) which is now the City of London Corporation international business policy “think tank” of the business world based in London. James Warburg’s Jewish father, Paul Warburg (1868-1932) and his brother Felix Warburg were both partners in N. M. Rothschild & Sons London international banking house subsidiary, Kuhn, Loeb and Company, New York, headed by Jacob H. Schiff.   

    When the huge Chase Manhattan Bank was created by the union of the Rockefeller-owned Chase Bank with the Kuhn, Loeb and Company-controlled Manhattan Bank, N.M. Rothschild & Sons in London took over control, with Rockefellers only owning about 4% of the shares in the merged company. Paul Warburg was instrumental in founding the US Federal Reserve in 1913.   Dr. Carl Melchoir who founded the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, in 1930, (that controls the NZ Reserve Bank) was a partner in Rothschild’s international banking subsidiary, M.Warburg & Company, based in Frankfurt, Germany.  M. Warburg & Company was  headed by Max Warburg who was also Paul Warburg’s brother.


    Today, not only does the Chase Manhattan Bank through two of its New York nominee shareholding companies control the Westpac Banking Corporation in Australia, and consequently its  sister  branch  in  New  Zealand, it is also the appointed New Zealand Government Banker. 


    In 1952 the ‘World Association of Parliamentarians for World Government’ then appeared with a secret blueprint to create a special organization for “parliamentarians” dedicated to abolishing each nations’ national sovereignty and replacing it with world government through a reformed United Nations. Douglas Reed in his book The Battle for Rhodesia quotes from its documents. 


    On May 4, 1958, a debate on the Association’s plans for ‘World Order’ was held in the British House of Lords. Nineteen years later, Parliamentarians for World Order was founded on November 23, 1977, to work with an organization originally called Union of European Federalists founded in Luxembourg in September 1946, renamed World Movement for World Federal Government, in Paris, December 15, 1946, and finally renamed World Association for World Federation (WAWF) in 1956.


    Since its founding in 1977, Parliamentarians for World Order has worked hand in hand with the WAWF, and their affiliated sub-groups, Young World Federalists renamed World Federalist Youth Movement for a New International Order, and Youth for Development and Cooperation, renamed more recently ‘Just World Order through a Strengthened United Nations.’ 



    Another group that Parliamentarians for World Order has worked with is World Government of World Citizens, founded September 4, 1953, in Ellsworth, ME, in USA, that  has  been  behind  the  Fabian’s  plans  to  institute  a  World  Citizenship, World  Passport, World Identity Card, World Dollar or World Currency Unit. The WAWF now has its head office at the UN, 777 UN Plaza, in New York.    


    In 1986 Parliamentarians for World Order changed its name to Parliamentarians for Global Action. Since this date the organization has worked closely with the Global Ratification Network and the World Constitution and Parliament Association for the ratification and implementation of the Constitution for the Federation of Earth.


    As a favorite “baby daughter” of the British Sovereign, New Zealanders fill a large number a world leadership positions way out of proportion to the size and population of their little country – and this is no better illustrated than through their membership of Parliamentarians for Global Action.


    In 1981, NZ Labour MP Richard Prebble was appointed one of the 12 Councilors of Parliamentarians for World Order (PGA). NZ’s Mr. Nick Dunlop, was first Secretary-General up to 1989 when former New Zealand diplomat, Dr. Kennedy Graham, took his place. [Coincidentally, Dr. Graham’s brother, former National Party MP for Remuera, and former Minister of Justice and Minister in Charge of Treaty of Waitangi negotiations, Mr. Douglas Graham (now Sir), in 1997 was paid by the Rockefeller Foundation to attend a 4 week in-house program at Bellagio near the shores of picturesque Lake Como in Northern Italy, to map out New Zealand’s UN Maori Settlement process. (NZ Herald May 10, 1997)]


    By 1986 Labour Party MP Helen Clark was Branch Secretary in New Zealand, when approximately 40 members of the New Zealand Parliament were members. Now the Labour Prime Minister of New Zealand, Helen Clark is still a member of PGA.


National MP Katherine O’Regan, in a letter dated February 21, 1991, provided a list of MPs by country as it appeared in the PGA’s Annual Report. The ten countries with the largest membership in order were: Canada – 97, USSR – 80, UK – 50, Peru – 41, Brazil   – 40, USA – 38, Australia – 31, India – 30, Denmark – 24, and New Zealand 17. 


    In 1989, former PGA member, MP Kerry Burke (now Sir), and former Speaker of the New Zealand Parliament, led a delegation on a trip to Russia to study President Gorbachev’s reforms. The Dominion newspaper June 15, 1989, ran a report on Mr. Burke’s trip. It was headed: “Perestroika Just Like Rogernomics” and said, “…Mr. Burke said it was quite staggering to see the similarities between the Soviet reforms and those occurring in New Zealand and other Western Economies … it is just about identical in every respect”. 


    It is not just a coincidence that former Labour Party NZ Finance Minister, Sir Roger Douglas, since retiring from Parliament, has been contracted as a consultant for the World Bank to advise on “privatization” programs in both Brazil and the newly restructured Soviet states.


    In 1990 the PGA established its “Eminent Persons Panel” to honor some of its most cherished members. The late Labour NZ Prime Minister, David Lange, was appointed to the panel for his work as World Recruitment Officer. Subsequently Mr. Lange was honored by the Queen.


    NZ MPs who were early members of PGA as at February 21, 1991, were: J. Anderton, D. Caygill, M. Cullen, P. East, J. Hunt, D. Lange, M. Moore (who more recently was Director-General of the WTO), R. Story, K. O’Regan, G. Braybrooke, H. Clark, S. Davies, J. Elder, G. Kelly, C. Matthewson, R. Prebble, and F. Wilde. In 1994 MP Michael Laws stated that he was a member.


     As at March 22, 2004, PGA members of the NZ Parliament were: Jim Anderton (PC = Progressive Coalition), Rick Barker (L = Labour), Tim Barnett (L), Dr Don Brash (N = National), Gerry Brownlee (N), Dr Ashraf Choudhary (L), PM Helen Clark (L), Dr Michael Cullen (L), David Cuniffe (L), Lianne Dalziel (L), Rod Donald (G = Green), Helen Duncan (L),   Harry Duynhoven (L),    Ruth Dyson (L),  Jeanette  Fitzsimons (G),  Martin Gallagher (L), Phil Goff (L), Ann Hartley (L), Pete Hodgson (L), Jonathan Hunt (L), Annette King (L), Keith Locke (G), Janet Mackey (L), Steve Maharey (L), Nanaia Mahuta (L), Trevor Mallard (L),  Dr Wayne Mapp (N), Damien O’Connor (L), Mark Peck (L), Jill Pettis (L), Lynne Pillay (L), Ross Robertson (PC), Dr Linda Scott (N), Ken Shirley (A = Act), Dr Nick Smith (N), Jim Sutton (L), Paul Swain (L), Nandor Tanczos (G),  Georgina  Te  Heuheu (N),  Judith  Tizard (L),  Pansy  Wong (N),  Dianne Yates (L). [Labour:29, National:7, Green:4, Progressive Coalition:2, Act:1 = total:43].


    Work is now well advanced to add a “second assembly” to the United Nations, possibly to be called a “Peoples’ Assembly,” which will be controlled by a type of Central Committee as was the case in the former Soviet Union. 


    In 1945, when the UN was created out the old League of Nations, the President of the Council of the League of Nations was M. M. Litvinoff – former Bolshevik Commissar for Foreign Affairs. From 1945, virtually all of the Under-Secretaries of the United Nations Security Council, (Under-Secretary for Security and Political Affairs) based in New York, have been former Russian Communist generals. Arkady Alexandrovitch Sobolev was the first, holding the position from 1946 to 1949. 


    Parliamentarians for Global Action’s statement on “Global Governance” up to 1995, was largely taken from “The Stockholm Initiative.” One of the 32 co-authors of the document was Sweden’s PM Ingvar Carlsson – a close personal friend of Mikhail Gorbachev.


     Three weeks after signing the Sino-Soviet Agreement (between China and the Soviet Union) in April 1991, when Gorbachev was in Oslo picking up his cheque and Nobel Peace prize in May, (for ending the Cold War and allowing  for  the  overthrow  of  the old Communist order in Eastern Europe) he said: “To me it is self-evident that if  Soviet  Perestroika succeeds there will be a real chance of building a New World Order.” An understatement if ever there was one! – since he still says he is a devout Communist!


    In November 2004 the European Parliament approved, by a large majority, the appointment of 25 new Commissioners who will run the EU for the next five years. Virtually all these individuals are rabid Socialists and at least seven of the new commissioners are former members of the Communist Party, including the new European Commission President, Jose Manuel Durao Barroso, and the new European Commissioner for Taxation, Laszlo Kovacs, who was a leading Hungarian Communist. Since becoming the new President of the Commission, Mr. Barroso has given Mr. Siim Kallas the EU Portfolio covering Administration, audit and Anti-Fraud Measures. Prior to his appointment with the EU, Mr. Kallas was a high ranking Communist in the Soviet Union.


    The United Nations Organization, EU and Parliamentarians for Global Action are not, as they often commonly deceptively claim, “interfaith” organizations. They are Communist to the core.

OECD “Residential Equity Tax” and Property Confiscation

    On June 20, 2001, the McLeod Tax Review interim paper was released, prior to the final 200 page report’s final presentation to the NZ Government in October 2001. That  report recommended that the Government introduce a new “Residential Equity Tax” on all owner-occupied and rental housing throughout the country, while at the same time, limit all tax paid by the wealthy in New Zealand to a cap of $1 million). 


    The tax review chairman, Rob McLeod, at the time, also served on the Treaty of Waitangi Fisheries Commission and was a member of the “Fabian” Business Roundtable. He is now the chairman of the NZ Business Roundtable.


    Once again, like the “Sustainable Development” and “Smart-Growth” policies being introduced by councils, “Residential Equity Tax” is not the creation of the McLeod Tax Review itself, but is a recommendation from the international City of London Fabian Socialist banking despots at the OECD.

    The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD),  based  in Paris, is the international economic policy divisional arm of major City of London banks and multinational corporations, which work closely with the UN, to reform all of the major economic policies of national governments around the world. 


    In 1998 the OECD was lobbying to pass the Multilateral Agreement on Investments (MAI), which would give corporations unlimited rights in any country that signs the agreement. The MAI is designed to establish a whole new set of global rules for investments that will grant transnational corporations the unrestricted right and freedom to buy, sell, and move their operations whenever and wherever they want around the world, unfettered by government intervention or regulation. In short, the OECD through the MAI seeks to empower transnational corporations by severely restricting what national governments can and cannot do, ultimately to allow the banks and corporations to privatize and own everything and destroy the sovereignty of individual nations.   

    The NZ Herald June 21, 2001, p.C1, published an article on the McLeod Tax Review proposals for Residential Equity Tax and said:

    “The option under consideration, similar to the one in use in the Netherlands, uses the risk-free return method. 

    It takes the value of the house at the start of the year, less any debt owing on it. That figure is then multiplied by the inflation-adjusted return on a risk-free investment such as a one year Government bond and the end amount is taxed at the investor’s tax rate.

    For example: David and Ruth own a $200,000 house with a $100,000 mortgage. His marginal tax rate is 39c in the dollar, hers is 21c. The real, risk-free return is 4 per cent.

    The taxable “income” from their owner-occupied house is therefore $4,000, which is split equally between them, so he pays an extra $780 in tax and she pays $420.

    The review said that the extra tax raised of $750 million a year should be applied to reducing income tax.

    Mr. McLeod said the impact of the tax would fall more on the rich than the poor and it would depress the value of houses as buyers took account of the extra tax.

    The rationale for the tax is that if the money tied up in the house were used elsewhere it would most likely generate income.”


    Of course, with a $1 million tax cap on the wealthy, the tax is carefully designed to confiscate the homes and rental investments of pensioners and the middle class, predominantly the only people left in the entire country that own any property of substance that isn’t already owned by the major corporations or is heavily mortgaged.


    Fortunately, in 2001, there was a public outcry, and the Helen Clark Labour-led Government didn’t have the “courage” to implement McLeod’s deadly Fabian recommendations. However, they have “broken the ice” and the Fabian-controlled media continue to remind the public that “there is too much money tied up in  the Nations’ housing stock” indicating their plans are still alive and well and simmering on the backburner to gradually confiscate private property. 


    There is a distinct possibility that the huge increases in council rates globally at present are primarily being used to “pressure’ the general populace to accept some major change in the structure of funding local body government in the near future – possibly  the subtle introduction of a Residential Equity Tax of some sort, or a Poll Tax, although the latter is probably not going to suit their plans, because historically the Fabian Society’s major objective has always concentrated on the abolition of private property, and Poll taxes traditionally in Britain going back hundreds of years have been consistently hated. Traditionally, a number of Lord Mayors have “lost their heads” as the result of harsh Poll Tax policies.


Fabian Plan to “Microchip” Everyone on Earth

    Coincidentally, not only do the Fabian, “Christian Socialist” banking despots in the City of London and Church of England want to enslave everybody on earth through debt, thievery and economic blackmail under their Ten Year Plan. Finally they want to abolish all cash and cheques completely, and introduce a cashless-based “Soviet-style” surveillance system for all buying and selling centered on the micro-chipping of everyone on earth. What they want is total control of the masses – total police state power! 

    Presently the Blair Government microchip-based Identity Card Bill is being debated in the House of Commons and House of Lords. It is proposed that the system will be implemented and fully operational by 2008, and after that date in Britain you will not be able to travel overseas, buy food or petrol without the card. 


    The bankers already know that the card can be easily lost or stolen, and they are planning for it to be quickly replaced with implantable microchips. All countries are following the British system. As the result of new standards imposed on Telecom NZ by City of London banks through the new EMV (Europay, Mastercard, Visa) security standards for electronic transactions, in 2004 Telecom NZ signed a large contract to convert all of New Zealand’s 80,000-plus Eftpos mobile banking terminals to Verifone Implantable Microchip-reading Terminals


    The whole project is planned to be completed by 2008 – ready for their secret plan to microchip everybody in the country starting with dogs. Key propaganda phrases for the project are: “One never knows which dog may bite; therefore all dogs must be micro-chipped.” “One never knows who is a sexual predator or terrorist, therefore all citizens must be micro-chipped” – “One law for all – no exceptions!” – and watch those “Letters to the Editor” columns too  – some are not actually written by members of the public themselves, but are written by treacherous newspaper editors and journalists who “follow the line” of their global paymasters – an old Nazi trick used in the Third Reich. 


Abolition of the Legal System and the coming


World,  Socialist  “Philosopher  Prince” 

    THE FABIAN SOCIETY wants the Westminster Parliamentary and Constitutional System of government to be totally abolished. The old, established Christian-based  laws based largely on the Bible, Magna Carta, Habeas Corpus, Double Jeopardy, the Right to Trial by Jury etc. are to be abolished – and replaced with the old Inquisitional, Napoleonic code of dictatorial law called Corpus Juris, which is already the established legal system now in the European Union – similar to communist China and Russia. 


    Old Bailey, Temple Bar and the Royal Courts of Justice in London, British Houses of Parliament, and the US Capitol in Washington DC are all in line for total annihilation.       


    While Guy Fawkes (and the Catholic Jesuits) failed to blow up the Protestant House of Commons and English Parliament on November 5, 1605 – from without – now the Marxists and Fabians led by Tony Blair and others from within, are preparing the world for their soon-coming communist “revolution” – and Plato’s “socialist” world republican royal “philosopher prince” and consort to complete the task – who will, like the masked vigilante “V” and his consort in the Fabian movie, V FOR VENDETTA – abolish the United States of America, blow up the British Houses of Parliament, and through his philosophical wisdom, love of truth and justice, rise up against the totalitarian Nazi state of tyranny and oppression, fraught with cruelty and corruption –  come and save the world – and free its struggling citizens forever! May God help us all! 

The Solution: - (or is the nation “past the point of no return”?)


    Can ratepayers, at least in the short term, hold councils to account over unacceptable rate rises?  Yes they can. Talk to local mayors and councilors. Some are quite genuine, and you’ll be surprised at how many are absolutely oblivious as to what is really happening. Education and honesty are the keys to success. It pays to speak up. After a revolt, the State Government in California in 1976 passed Proposition 13 which forced local councils to reduce rates on their citizens, although they are now once again rising.


    In May 1996, Benjamin Netanyahu was elected Israel’s youngest Prime Minister. He was thrown out three years later, and was again re-elected to become Israel’s new Finance Minister. During that term, he introduced some of the most rapid, breathtaking, Fabian “privatization” programs and social reforms ever undertaken in the world using Sir Roger Douglas’s radical book, Unfinished Business. He met Sir Roger in Jerusalem at a think-tank symposium in 2004, and like many other countries, structured Israel’s rapid sell-off on New Zealand’s global, guinea-pig “Rogernomics” model. 


    However, unlike the case in New Zealand, where most of the general population were either sound asleep or incredibly apathetic, Israel’s “pensioners” were not so impressed with his rapid sell-off of their precious “family silver.” They took major steps to rectify the situation, and in the recent General Election in Israel on March 29, 2006, right-wing Likud Party leader Benjamin Netanyahu, and the other 10 members of his treacherous party were humiliatingly defeated. 


    The biggest surprise of the entire election came from the newly created Pensioners’ Party headed by former Mossad spymaster chief, Rafi Etian, which gained seven seats – for its single issue program – “protect the rights of pensioners” and “don’t sell off our birthright.” 


    Right now the creation of such a party in New Zealand is well overdue.  


    As an elementary start the Central Government should be pressured to quickly pass a law to ensure all citizens’ property rates are equitable, and if necessary, force councils to lower their ambitions, live within their incomes, and subsequently reduce their rates burdens substantially if necessary – not through Fabian Rates Rebates! Secondly, the Government should introduce a bill to limit all future rate rises to “no more than the change in the consumer price index.” Thirdly, a bill should be passed to “severely restrict all local government and council borrowing to levels that can be easily  serviced without the necessity to unreasonably increase rates and taxes in the future.”    


HOWEVER, will this ever happen?


    When the two major, leading political parties in the country, Labour and National, are both deeply wrapped up in the pockets of Treasury controlled by City of London international bankers –  and a high proportion of our MPs are political puppets who dance to the tune of Parliamentarians for Global Action – while the New Zealand Labour Party is more Fabian Socialist than British PM Tony Blair on a good day in the House of Commons – the City of London Jewish banking despots have now got a “mort-gage” ‘death-bond’ over the entire country to the tune of about $135 billion and rapidly rising – foreign British-controlled companies control and censor the entire media in the country, control most of the distribution and price of food, goods, communications, transport and energy supplies – an aligned judiciary and police force  – and most of the general population is overwhelmingly  ignorant  and  apathetic – it  would sadly appear that we have almost “passed the point of no return” and that there is now little hope of changing the situation – short of the inevitable, soon-coming Marxist “revolution” the Fabians anticipate, have in mind, and have long since planned.



    A full-scale war is taking place. In short, all New Zealanders need to wake up  and wake up  fast.


For if  they  don’t, every single vestige of what they have worked for is soon going to be insidiously taken away from them and their grandchildren – for the Communist 10 Year Plan presently being implemented by councils throughout the country is the “beginning” of the Fabian Society’s final “coup de grâce.” 


    Author Denis Mckenna, in his timely book, Which Way New Zealand? – National Sovereignty or World Government poignantly quotes Marcus Tullius Cicero, the great Roman philosopher, orator and statesman (106-43 BC), who eloquently wrote:

    “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious, but it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly. But the traitor moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears no traitor, he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation; he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city; he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared.”


 About a hundred and fifteen years after the death of Fabian Quintus Maximus Verrucosus, Cicero himself had observed before he was fifteen that the dictator’s cunning military strategy of “gradualism” had been adopted by traitors within his own Roman Senate. About twenty years later, around 67 BC, he exposed the conspiracy of Catiline by which he earned the title Father of his Country, penned his words and gave us his warning. 


    Similarly, before Frank Podmore named the Fabian Society in 1884, he had extensively read the Greek Classics and works of Cicero. Highly educated Fabians in London do know what they’re doing! If a man has all the knowledge and money in the world, and yet, does not possess a genuine love of truth, justice and charity for his fellow man – in the end, is it all worth it?


    The paradox and tragedy of it all is that when their “Revolution” soon finally comes, those who have been the chief political instigators and business despots instrumental in bringing it all about – will be the very first to be liquidated in the New World Order socialist administration – as previously was the case under socialists Hitler and Stalin.


    Stalin murdered millions. While claiming to bring “socialist” peace, equity, justice and prosperity to his people in his delusional dream “United Nations” Soviet Socialist Republic, he ruthlessly ruled his dictatorship with an iron fist. 


    Under his diabolically evil rule, the life, death or imprisonment of all Russian citizens was in the hands of the Jew, Jagoda, who was head of the G.P.U. (the former Cheka) in 1935 called “The People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs – which now just happens to be the very same Department of Internal Affairs in both Britain and New Zealand that is presently introducing the implantable microchip-based Identity Cards and Passports. 


    Between 1929 and 1934, under the Fabian Five Year Plan, Jagoda drove between 5 and 6 million innocent Russian peasants from their homes. Now we have our own Ten year Plan. Unless stopped, this is the beginning of the end.  Will man ever learn?


                          ~ There is a price to pay for turning away from God.   ~





Theresa May says ‘without its Jews Britain would not be Britain’
Theresa May has said that greater efforts must be made to combat anti-Semitism and “without its Jews, Britain would not be Britain”.
The Home Secretary asserted that the country would not be the same without people of different faiths, while she was speaking at an event in London to commemorate the victims of the Paris attacks.



“Pope Francis is a fan of London’s new Muslim mayor”
“Pope Francis says that London’s election of the first Muslim mayor of a Western capital is an example of how migrants can be integrated in Europe. Voters in the English capital elected Sadiq Khan, the son of a Pakistani bus driver, on May 6 after a campaign in which the Conservative candidate, Zac Goldsmith, was criticized for focusing on Labour candidate Khan’s religion.”



Windows 10 hijacking computers
Microsoft has turned “nasty” in its campaign to coerce hundreds of millions of customers to upgrade to its Windows 10 operating system, a program critics condemn as privacy-invading, data-swiping and “brimming with freemium services and ads.”
Microsoft has been trying to lure computer users into its new operating system for months, bombarding them with unending pop-up screens. But many users are comfortable with the systems they have, have no interest in learning new operations and have simply clicked the “X” to get rid of the unwanted solicitation.
You can’t do that anymore.
Microsoft changed the coding on the “X” so that clicking it now instructs MS to “upgrade” your computer to Windows 10. Yes, really.
In fact, the two options on the page, “OK” and “Upgrade Now,” do the same thing as the “X.”
To avoid the forced “upgrade,” a user has to go into the fine print.
Inside a logo box in the ad is a scheduled date for a mandatory upgrade. The user must look in the tiny type just below that line and find where it says “here” and click on that to avoid the upgrade.



Nigel Farage planning to move to U.S.
Despite the UK seemingly turning into his ideal over the last dew months, Nigel Farage is reportedly off to start a new life as an economic migrant Stateside.
The former/ex/reinstated/interim (delete as applicable) Ukip leader has let slip to friends that he’s preparing to move to the US with his wife Kirsten, according to The Times.
Despite the fact his party helped Britain ‘break free from the shackles of unelected officials in Brussels’, which is costing the UK £225 million every week by the way, equally unelected Farage will feel ‘freer’ in the US.
It’s not yet known if Farage is moving across the pond to work alongside President-elect Donald Trump, who recently said the Ukipper would make a great US ambassador.



UK – “The Government is now RECORDING everywhere you click online”
Internet users in the United Kingdom are facing greater online surveillance than ever before after a controversial new law officially came into force.
December 30th marks the date that the Investigatory Powers Act, also known as the ‘Snooper’s Charter’ officially comes into force, allowing the government to collect data on anyone.
The government says that the new laws will primarily be used to combat serious crimes such as terrorism, but campaigners have warned that it could lead to innocent people being convicted of offences they didn’t commit.
The new legislation, described as “world-leading” by home secretary Amber Rudd, will primarily be used to carry out bulk email surveillance, as authorities look to monitor communications between suspects.
However it could also be used to monitor other personal information, including phone records and web browsing history, with web and phone companies required to store this information for 12 months.
The companies would also need to be able to provide police, security services and official agencies with access to this data whenever required.
Law enforcement agencies would also be given powers to hack into the computers and mobile devices of potential suspects.



UK Parliament Set To Launch ‘Fake News’ Inquiry
A prominent British parliamentary committee is set to launch an inquiry into so-called “fake news”, claiming the phenomenon is undermining democracy.
The Commons Culture Committee is expected to summon the bosses of big social media firms such as Facebook, Google, and Twitter to explain what they are doing to suppress online content that falls short of government standards.
The committee is discussing launching the inquiry internally and intends to begin holding sessions by late spring or early summer, The Telegraph reports.
In December, German officials proposed creating a special government unit to combat fake news, with the Justice Minister even threatening to sue Facebook unless unfavourable content was deleted quickly.



“Schools Now Push 11-Year-Olds To Question Their Gender Identity”
A leading girls’ school is allowing pupils to change their names to boys’ names and wear boys’ clothes.
Pupils over the age of 16 at St Paul’s Girls’ School in West London can now enter a formal process to self-identify as boys or as “gender-neutral.”
So far, up to 10 sixth-form girls at the school are understood to have done so.

Pupils as Young as 11 Can ‘Discuss’ Issue

St Paul’s is a high-performing private school with alumnae such as Harriet Harman, MP, and actress Rachel Weisz.
Under the new policy, pupils over 16 can submit a written request to identify as male or “gender neutral.”
Pupils between 11-15 “can have discussions at any time” to explore their “gender identity,” and will receive help to prepare for an application “at the right time”…
Its headmistress, Clarissa Farr, said: “We are moving to the point where your gender is a choice…”


British university bars students from using 34 ‘sexist’ terms
Students at one British university could be reprimanded if they use one or more of the 34 newly banned terms deemed “sexist” by college administrators.
Cardiff Metropolitan University in Cardiff, Wales, recently revised its code of practices, according to The Independent, asking students to use terms that are more inclusive and gender neutral instead of allowing their “cultural backgrounds” to inform the kinds of words they use on campus.
The lengthy list of banned terms include words like “mankind,” “sportsmanship,” “forefathers” and “gentleman’s agreement.” University administrators are calling on students to “embrace cultural diversity” by abandoning such terminology.
Also, the school is asking its students to no longer employ the terms “homosexual” and “heterosexual” because they are “laden with the values of a previous time.”



“Prestigious school will allow 3-year-olds to switch uniforms… and gender”
“One of England’s most prestigious private schools is considering allowing boys to wear girls’ uniforms in the wake of student demands for so-called ‘gender neutrality.’
Highgate School’s principal, Adam Pettitt, told the Sunday Times that if the children are happier and more secure in who they are, it must be a good thing. ‘This generation is really questioning being binary in the way we look at things,’ he said.
Highgate School was founded more than 400 years ago by a royal charter of Queen Elizabeth I…
The school, which already has a cross-dressing male student, accedes to requests by students to be called by opposite-gender names. Also in London, St. Paul’s Girls School made headlines in February when it decided to allow its pupils to use boys’ names and wear boys’ clothes.  Girls age 16 and over may apply for a formal process after which they will be acknowledged as boys or gender-neutral.”



Theresa May to create new internet that would be controlled and regulated by government
Theresa May is planning to introduce huge regulations on the way the internet works, allowing the government to decide what is said online.
Particular focus has been drawn to the end of the manifesto, which makes clear that the Tories want to introduce huge changes to the way the internet works.
“Some people say that it is not for government to regulate when it comes to technology and the internet,” it states. “We disagree.”
Senior Tories confirmed to BuzzFeed News that the phrasing indicates that the government intends to introduce huge restrictions on what people can post, share and publish online.
The plans will allow Britain to become “the global leader in the regulation of the use of personal data and the internet”, the manifesto claims.
It comes just soon after the Investigatory Powers Act came into law. That legislation allowed the government to force internet companies to keep records on their customers’ browsing histories, as well as giving ministers the power to break apps like WhatsApp so that messages can be read.



“UK bishops’ group pushing radical LGBT propaganda in Catholic schools”
“Parents in the UK have taken to social media to protest LGBT ideology being introduced into Catholic schools. An agency of the UK bishops has approved a program that in part draws material from high-profile LGBT activist groups.
The program, titled Made in God’s Image: Challenging homophobic and biphobic bullying in Catholic Schools, was produced by the Catholic Education Service (CES), an agency of the Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales, with a leading Catholic University, St Mary’s Twickenham.  It is purportedly to assist Catholic schools meet their government mandated obligation to address and challenge bullying among pupils.
Head Teachers’, teachers’ and governors’ performance in tackling bullying is monitored by UK government school inspectors, the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted). Furthermore, all schools have a legal duty to ensure that pupils do not suffer any form of discrimination due to race, sex, sexual orientation and gender reassignment, amongst other protected characteristics set out in the Equalities Act, 2010.”


‘Millions of Africans’ will flood Europe unless it acts now, warns European chief, as Paris evacuates huge migrant camp
Europe is “underestimating” the scale and severity of the migration crisis and “millions of Africans” will flood the continent in the next five years unless urgent action is taken, a senior European official has warned.
The dire prediction from Antonio Tajani, president of the European Parliament, came as Paris evacuated almost 3,000 migrants sleeping rough from a makeshift camp near the city centre – the 34th such evacuation in two years.
In an interview with Il Messagero newspaper, Mr Tajani said there would be an exodus “of biblical proportions that would be impossible to stop if we don’t confront the problem now”…
“Today we are trying to solve a problem of a few thousand people, but we need to have a strategy for millions of people.”
The only solution is massive investment in Africa to dissuade people from leaving in the first place, he said.


“‘Ladies and gentlemen’ greeting banned on famed London subway”
“After months of lobbying from LGBT activists, the famed London Underground train (or “tube”) will cease using the time-honored ‘ladies and gentlemen’ greeting, Metro reported.
Transport for London workers instead will use phrases such as ‘good afternoon, everyone’ as the city moves toward more widespread gender neutrality, the outlet said.
‘We want everyone to feel welcome on our transport network,’ Mark Evers, director of customer strategy at TFL, said in a statement. ‘We have reviewed the language that we use in announcements and elsewhere and will make sure that it is fully inclusive, reflecting the great diversity of London.’
All new prerecorded announcements will be changed, Metro reported, and written guidance for staff will be reviewed and changed.
London Mayor Sadiq Khan addressed the issue last month, noting that he’s ‘keen that TFL addresses these concerns by speaking in a more neutral way when referring to gender.’
Khan said that if ‘well-meaning’ workers slip up and utter a ‘ladies and gentlemen’ enough times, ‘TFL will issue reminders to staff.'”



“Campaigners are pushing for secondary schools across England to affirm LGBT lifestyles and teach kids about homosexual practice”
“Campaigners are pushing for secondary schools across England to affirm LGBT lifestyles and teach kids about homosexual practice, under new Relationships and Sex Education (RSE).
The Chief Executive of homosexual lobby group Stonewall, Ruth Hunt, has expressed her desire for RSE – a new curriculum subject in England – to include teaching on ‘LGBT issues and same-sex relationships’.
Liberal religious figures have also called for RSE to affirm the LGBT agenda, including in faith schools.

Relationships Education

Earlier this year, the Government gave the green light to RSE and primary-level Relationships Education.
The Christian Institute has warned that Relationships Education could expose young children to teaching on homosexuality, transsexualism and same-sex marriage.
RSE will involve teaching on ‘sexuality’, and ministers have suggested that the current right for parents to withdraw their children from sex education could be restricted.

Homosexual practice

Since the new subjects were announced, Stonewall has lobbied for the promotion of homosexuality and transsexualism in RSE.
Speaking to The Telegraph earlier this week, Ruth Hunt called for more pupils to be taught about homosexual practice.
She said: ‘Now that compulsory Relationships and Sex Education is set to become a reality in England, it’s vital that the government’s guidance ensures that these lessons are always inclusive of LGBT issues and same-sex relationships.’

Faith schools

A push to ensure that schools with a religious designation also endorse the LGBT agenda has been made by several religious figures.
A letter to The Guardian co-signed by Rabbi Dr Jonathan Romain, Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, Revd Steve Chalke and others claims that RSE risks being ‘hijacked’ by those who hold biblical views on sexual ethics.
The letter states that faith schools should be required to ‘actively promote the acceptance of LGBT people and provide, for pupils of sufficient maturity, factual information about contraception and abortion’.

Parental rights

A spokesman for The Christian Institute said: ‘Campaigners are mounting a co-ordinated push to ensure that the LGBT agenda is affirmed by all schools – including faith schools.'”


“U.K. gov’t demands ‘queer theology’ in seminaries”
“An executive agency of the United Kingdom’s Foreign and Commonwealth Office has issued a report recommending that seminaries include ‘queer theology’ in their courses and that even Sunday schools teach ‘LGBTI beliefs.’

The stunning document, released by Wilton Park, an agency of the Foreign Office, also recommends that the Bible be reinterpreted ‘to make it compatible with LGBTI ideology.’
The Barnabas Fund, an organization that supports persecuted Christians worldwide, was surprised and more than a little worried.
‘The recommendations, if implemented, would massively reverse freedom of religion across the globe,’ the group said.”


EU To Demand $70 Billion In Brexit Divorce And “Will Not Let Britain Off The Hook”
Britain has been warned by the Prime Minister of Luxembourg, Xavier Bettel, it could face a Brexit “divorce bill” of £54 billion (US$70 billion). Mr. Bettel also criticized British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson for inflammatory remarks he made recently.

Earlier in July, Mr. Johnson said European Union officials could “go whistle” if they expect Britain to pay a substantial sum of money as the bill for the Brexit “divorce.”
But Mr. Bettel said Mr. Johnson was just “bragging” to a British audience.
“It is not possible to have your cake and eat it too — Boris Johnson knows that,” he said.
“Concerning the exit bill, it is important to underline that the British Government took this commitment in the past and needs to honor it. It is not a penalty. The sum ranges between £36bn (US$47 billion) and £54bn (US$70 billion),” he added.


UK government cracking down on “homophobic, transphobic” social media posts
A top prosecutor for the British government warned in a new article that it will crack down on “online hate crime” committed by “those in the UK who hold extreme views” on “sexuality” and “gender.”

Alison Saunders, director of public prosecutions for the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), wrote in The Guardian, “whether shouted or tweeted, prejudice devastates lives.”
Policing Internet speech could be one solution for the questions of “how societies might do more to prevent such opinions from gestating in the first place,” Saunders wrote.
“An increasing proportion of hate crime is now perpetrated” online, wrote Saunders. CPS “commits to treat online hate crimes as seriously as those committed face to face.”

A follow-up article in The Guardian said CPS has a new policy that will “cover different strands of hate crime: racist and religious; disability; and homophobic, biphobic and transphobic. They also say that victims of biphobic hate crime, aimed at bisexual people, have different needs and experiences compared to those suffering anti-gay and transphobic offences.”

Saunders… “With more than 15,000 hate crime prosecutions in 2015-16, prosecutors are now increasingly able to persuade courts that stiffer ‘uplifted’ sentences are warranted,” Saunders continued, referring to government lobbying to increase sentences. “This year’s hate crime report, when published later this year, will show for the first time that the CPS achieved sentence uplifts in more than half of such cases.”

“Hate crime of any form is not only damaging for individuals but also for society as a whole, where it sows seeds of division and intolerance,” Saunders wrote. “Left unchallenged, even low-level offending can subsequently fuel the kind of dangerous hostility that has been plastered across our media in recent days. That is why countering it is vital for society and a priority for the CPS.”


“Gov’t threatens developer: Build gay bar or we’ll shut you down”
A U.K. City Council has ordered a private company that it cannot build luxury flats and offices on a site it recently purchased that included a closed gay-bar unless it agrees to include a new gay bar as part of the development plan.

Tower Hamlets Council ordered earlier this month that developers Regal Homes must build a gay bar that will ‘remain a lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender-focused venue for a minimum of 12 years,’ regardless of its ability to stay economically afloat.
The bar will only be deemed ‘complete’ once it passes an inspection from the mayor’s office who will make sure it is sufficiently ‘gay.’ Standards for determining ‘gayness’ were not disclosed.
‘I am delighted that as a council we are leading the way in using innovative ways to protect spaces such as the Joiners Arms site,’ said Tower Hamlets Mayor John Biggs.”


UK gov’t announces plan to censor anti-LGBT social media posts
A top prosecutor for the British government warned in a new article that it will crack down on “online hate crime” committed by “those in the UK who hold extreme views” on “sexuality” and “gender.”

Alison Saunders, director of public prosecutions for the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), wrote in The Guardian, “whether shouted or tweeted, prejudice devastates lives.”
Policing Internet speech could be one solution for the questions of “how societies might do more to prevent such opinions from gestating in the first place,” Saunders wrote.
“An increasing proportion of hate crime is now perpetrated” online, wrote Saunders. CPS “commits to treat online hate crimes as seriously as those committed face to face.”

A follow-up article in The Guardian said CPS has a new policy that will “cover different strands of hate crime: racist and religious; disability; and homophobic, biphobic and transphobic. They also say that victims of biphobic hate crime, aimed at bisexual people, have different needs and experiences compared to those suffering anti-gay and transphobic offences.”


EU Prepares To Criminalize Pro-Life Views
The European Parliament has approved a report that claims reducing access to abortion is “violence against women and girls” and calls upon all member states to “guarantee abortion access.”
Breitbart News reports the legislators who drafted the report claim it’s not an attack on Christians, but instead “appeared to conflate a rise in violence against women with the election of President Trump.” Its report further states:

The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE) produced the interim report, which calls on all EU member-states to “urgently” ratify a new convention on violence against women, and “recommends”:

“The EU strongly affirms that the denial of sexual and reproductive health and rights services, including safe and legal abortion, is a form of violence against women and girls.”
All member-states must also “guarantee comprehensive sexuality education, ready access for women to family planning, and the full range of reproductive and sexual health services, including modern contraceptive methods and safe and legal abortion”.

If they fail to, it is implied they could be complicit in “forced pregnancy”, which the report asserts is “defined as a crime against humanity in Article 7 of the Rome Statute”.
The paper also calls on nations to “combat sexism and stereotyped gender roles – promoting gender-neutral language and address the key role of media and advertising.”


Spike In Airborne Radioactivity Detected In Europe
German officials say that a spike in radioactivity has been detected in the air in Western and Central Europe but there’s no threat to human health.

The Federal Office for Radiation Protection said Thursday that elevated levels of the isotope Ruthenium-106 have been reported in Germany, Italy, Austria, Switzerland and France since Sept. 29.
Spokesman Jan Henrik Lauer told The Associated Press the source of the Ruthenium-106 isn’t known but calculations indicate it may have been released in eastern Europe.


UK to imprison people who view “far-right propaganda’ online for up to 15 years
People in the United Kingdom could face up to fifteen years in prison for repeatedly viewing “far-right propaganda” or “terrorist material” online, according to a report.

According to the Guardian, “A new maximum penalty of 15 years’ imprisonment will also apply to terrorists who publish information about members of the armed forces, police and intelligence services for the purposes of preparing acts of terrorism,” while the “tightening of the law around viewing terrorist material is part of a review of the government’s counter-terrorism strategy following the increasing frequency of terrorist attacks in Britain this year.”

Users who view the forbidden content only once by mistake, or out of curiosity, will not be charged, and it is reported that there will also be protections for journalists, academics, and “others who may have a legitimate reason to view such material.”

“I want to make sure those who view despicable terrorist content online, including jihadi websites, far-right propaganda and bomb-making instructions, face the full force of the law,” declared British Home Secretary Amber Rudd. “There is currently a gap in the law around material [that] is viewed or streamed from the internet without being permanently downloaded.”

“This is an increasingly common means by which material is accessed online for criminal purposes and is a particularly prevalent means of viewing extremist material such as videos and web pages,” she continued.


EU plotting TOTAL DOMINATION: Brussels moves to take control of wages from member states
EUROPEAN Union MEPs are set to vote on handing more power over wages and social security standards of workers in Europe, according to a new report.

The report, by Italian left-winger Laura Agea, says the laws already exist for the European Union (EU) to take control over something which national governments have previously assumed is solely their competence.

The EU’s Committee on Employment and Social Affairs stops short of guaranteeing a minimum wage but so-called “minimum income schemes” would inevitably mean handing more powers to Brussels bureaucrats in being able to determine wages and social security programmes.
If introduced, the scheme will guarantee a minimum level of income to all citizens.
Even if the EU parliament votes for such a move it has no legislative power and can only make advisory proposals. Member states can still veto such a move.

Also buried in the report is an attempt to extend the tentacles of the EU into other areas that could be of concern for national sovereignty…

Such a move could give Brussels an open door to start dictating over a country’s domestic policies and start to impose rules and regulations…

The EU Parliament vote is likely to be backed by the more integrationist countries such as France and Germany who, under Emmanuel Macron and Angela Merkel, are pushing for greater integration.
Jayne Adye, director of the campaign group Get Britain Out told “This is a naked power grab by the EU – stripping even more control over the welfare and work systems of EU Member States.

“The EU is recklessly ignoring the differences between countries. A liveable minimum income in Germany would be very high in Bulgaria, and these changes would have devastating effects for poorer European countries. Worse still, approving this report would dismantle contributory systems – so what you pay in would have no relation to what you get back – a recipe for ingratitude and indolence, and would prove a disservice to those who’ve paid into their national systems.

“It may all sound good in some remote bureaucrat’s head, but in practice it would be devastating.
“Seizing on such important policy areas is also a brazen assault on national sovereignty, part of the one-way ratchet towards an EU federal superstate. If we were staying inside the EU, we too would be on track to lose control over this vital area. Thank goodness the UK voted to Leave!

“Taking welfare and work policies out of Democratic control – and subjecting them to the Brussels machine – just shows the EU still thinks it can get away with anything. This will only prove to the free peoples of Europe they cannot keep their freedom in the confines of the EU…”


“Transgender lessons for two-year-olds: Drag queens drafted into nursery schools to teach children about sexual diversity”
Drag queens are being brought into taxpayer-funded nursery schools so that children as young as two can learn about transgender issues.

The cross-dressers are reading nursery rhymes and singing specially adapted songs ‘to teach children about LGBT tolerance’.

Nursery bosses say the sessions are needed so that children can ‘see people who defy rigid gender restrictions’ and grow up to combat hate crime.
They want to target two and three-year-olds to influence them early, as they say at this age children have not yet developed any discriminatory ‘isms’.

The ‘performances’ are the brainchild of Thomas Canham, a Bristol University law graduate and part-time cross-dresser who dismisses traditional notions of masculinity as ‘meaningless’.
But critics last night said the sessions could ‘blind impressionable children of two and three to one of the most basic facts of human existence’.

Leading child psychotherapist Dilys Daws, co-author of the book Finding Your Way With Your Baby, feared they could sow the seeds of confusion in young children about their own sexual identity, with long-term consequences.

She said: ‘There’s this idea that’s sweeping the country that being transgender is an “ordinary situation”. It’s getting so much publicity that it’s getting children thinking that they might be transgender, when it otherwise wouldn’t have occurred to them.

Norman Wells, director of the Family Education Trust, said: ‘One of the most disturbing things about the transgender agenda is the way that it tries to distort our perception of reality and deny something as fundamental as the distinction between male and female.’

Mr Canham’s organisation Drag Queen Story Time (DQST) is holding sessions at seven nurseries run by the London Early Years Foundation over the winter. If deemed successful, they will be rolled out across all the nursery’s 37 sites.
The chain receives taxpayer cash as many of its children qualify for Government-funded childcare. Besides reading to the children, sessions so far have included a ‘Halloween drag disco’, face painting and ‘high tea’.

Drag queens at DQST include Donna La Mode, who wears a ginger wig and is described as ‘the Fairy Queen of the drag world’, and ‘hyperactive’ Aida.
Mr Canham, 26, started his organisation earlier this year after reading about a similar outfit in the US.


UK Considers Porn, Sexting Lessons For Primary Students
“British parents were stunned to learn this week the government is considering human sexuality lessons for elementary school children that includes online porn, sexting, homosexuality, and transgenderism.

According to the United Kingdom’s Sun newspaper, the British government is seeking “input from parents, teachers, and students” regarding its sex education requirements, which have remained untouched for nearly three decades. Education Secretary Justine Greening has already announced that sex ed will be “compulsory” in all schools in the UK—including parochial schools run by the Catholic Church and Church of England…

Thomas Pascoe of the Coalition for Marriage said:

Under these proposals, the leading agent in the early sexualization of children would be the state itself…
Meanwhile, LGBTQ activists are taking the opportunity to attack the religious liberties of faith-based schools. Peter Tatchell, a renowned British “gay rights campaigner,” has demanded Greening drop the concession that “faith schools” be allowed to have their lessons align with their faith.
He added:
Given that most religions do not accept same-sex relationships, it is hard to see how the government can square the right of faith schools to teach [Relationships and Sex Education] according to the tenets of their faith while also conforming to the requirements of the Equality Act.
What will happen when there is a conflict between the two?
Upholding the right of parents to withdraw their children from sex education at secondary level is a harmful concession that will deprive withdrawn pupils of access to information and support vital for their sexual and emotional health.
It will put them at greater risk of unwanted pregnancies, abortions and sexual infections, including HIV.”


“British Army Features Islamic Soldier Praying To Allah In New Commercial”

"What a sick country the U.K. has become!" -


Christchurch City Council - Fabian Socialist Takeover Of "The Garden City" - A Documentation



  “If there is ever a fascist takeover in America, it will come not in the form of storm troopers kicking down doors but with lawyers and social workers saying. "I'm from the government and I'm here to help.”

Jonah Goldberg, Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left from Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning


Communist Takeover in New Zealand In Action

Our coast and climate change - how might we adapt? - Christchurch City Council [November, 2017]









































Now a little about those pesky, worrying "Sea Level Rises" - Lord Christopher Monckton, in response to another climate huckster, Dr. David Wratt (ex- NIWA Climate Scientist).- [March 15, 2015]

Sea levels - Rising?

The profiteers of doom are at it again


Professor Wratt says, “The average rate of sea-level rise during
the past century has been larger than the average during the past 2000 years.” 


But that type of comparison of a short period with a long one (where short periods of sharp rise and fall are averaged out) is statistical malpractice.

Is the rate of sea-level rise over the past century greater than in any previous century? That is the right question, but the Professor did not ask it. So I asked it. 

Grinsted et al. (2009) showed that between 950 and 1050 AD, as the medieval climate optimum took hold, the rate of sea-level rise was no less great than in the past century. Not many SUVs about in those days.

Interestingly, Grinsted also showed that sea level was higher than today by 20 cm in the mediaeval climate optimum (or warm period, for warmer is better than colder), and lower than today by 20 cm during the little ice age about 300 years ago. Sea level does not change much in modern conditions, and, according to Professor Niklas Mörner in a 2011 paper, it may not be rising at all at present.

And why should it? One of the best-kept secrets in the climate debate is that the 3600 automated bathythermograph floats of the ARGO project, which measure the temperature of the upper 2000 m of the extrapolar ocean and report the results by satellite, show warming over their 11-year record at a rate equivalent to just 0.2 Kelvin (or Celsius degrees) per century. The Professor is careful to tell us the oceans are warming, but he is just as careful not to reveal just how little it is warming.

It is only by warming the ocean that we can cause sea level to rise. But after up to 18 years without any global warming, and up to 26 years without any statistically significant warming, the Professor’s statements about low-lying small islands being at risk from rising seas, and about “heat-induced mass coral bleaching” are unfounded.

Coral islands actually grow as sea level grows. It is no mere coincidence that thousands of coral atolls worldwide are exactly at or just above sea level. They have grown that way because sea level has risen by 130 m in the past 11,700 years. 


That is well over a metre a century, compared with just 0.2 metres in the 20th century.

The corals have simply grown to match. Besides, the satellite records from ENVISAT showed sea level rising from 2004-2012 at a rate of 3 cm per century.

The GRACE gravitational-anomaly satellites actually showed sea level falling from 2003-2009, so the data had to be adjusted to create a large enough sea-level rise to keep the panic dollars flowing.


'Climate Change' - The New Fabian Socialist "AGW/AGC" Scaremongering Hoax

 Problem-reaction-solution, the Hegelian Dialectic is that process the globalist ruling class have chosen to use as the primary tool to constantly change society in the direction they want it to go. They manufacture a problem, or a crisis, that being naturally occurring climate change, focus on that problem, using scaremongering tactics to get the desired reaction, then sell the solution, population withdrawal and restrictions on personal freedoms, etc.,  with the solution being the very thing that drives their plan forward.

This strategy, now known as the Hegelian Dialectic, has been used successfully by politicians for millennia to expand government, which can only grow at the expense of individual liberties.


 The above video presentation by the Christchurch City Council, better known as the Christchurch Communist Fabian Socialist City Council, illustrates this plan well, as it attempts to portray changing climate as something to be feared, when in every past age mankind has adapted and survived quite nicely, thank you very much by one means or another. 

There is certainly no evidence that sea levels are rising any more than they have both fallen and risen in the past, and that being chiefly the result of sea temperatures, which itself is dependent upon cyclical solar activity. 





Other Interesting Stuff Exposing The NWO Hidden or Not-So- Hidden Agenda-

Like Project Veritas ( James O'Keefe )



Project Veritas Latest Update


More on "shadow banning"/ghosting - Project veritas


By Their Fruits Ye Shall Know Them - Back To The Fabian Communist Council!


Against All The Scientific Evidence ('the science is not settled') regarding climate, the Communist Christchurch City Council, along with other councils in New Zealand, as already discussed in the introduction, is hell-bent on implementing the goals of Fabian Socialism, incorporating AGENDA 21 idealism in its tangled and far reaching web of 'smart growth,' 'sustainability,' 'environment before people' new religion, that will, in the end game, enslave, cull and control its citizens, that is, any remaining after councils with with support of government have broken communities apart,  who unknowingly put their faith and trust in their 'elected democratic' councils, who have other hidden ( not so hidden) plans for them!


A Sample Of 'Their' Track Record To Date:

In a roughly chronological order ... closing down Christchurch, especially after 2010/2011 Earthquakes!


1)  In their Draft Long Term Plan, C.C.C. declared about South Brighton Holiday Park ... 'the camp is precarious' 

 Read Full Article:

2) Rawhiti Golf Course was also earmarked for closure


3)  Boat Hire Business At the Popular Groynes Remains In  Limbo Thanks To The Communist Christchurch City Council




Read Full Article:

4) Seven years after the Earthquakes empty sites within the CBD equal three times the size of the Botanic Gardens!

Read Full Article:

5) Closure of Central New Brighton School Reduced To A Community Hub Centre - How To Destroy Communities

 Read Full Report: 


  6) Deliberate Sabotage By Council In Re-Positioning Of Storm Water Drain On Roadside To Exacerbate Flooding During Rainfall Events Previously Not Seen Before - Estuary Rd., South Brighton [ Backing For Non-Existent Hazard Claims ]


7)  More Shannagins By The Communist Christchurch City Council 


The owner of Cathedral Square's historic Old Post Office has hit out at city council redevelopment "road blocks".

The Christchurch City Council seemed "more intent on creating paperwork by insisting on more and more expert advice rather than allowing my engineers and builders to get on with the job of sensibly addressing the damage," Gordon Chamberlain said.

Chamberlain has been outspoken about the Square's redevelopment, previously saying he was "disappointed" by the lack of progress.

Chamberlain had "ongoing issues" with the council over his building. "I've been trying to progress a start on the reconstruction of the building, but everything I suggest to council ends in a road block," he said.


Just under $900,000 spent on Cathedral Square, but building owner 'very disappointed' with progress
New ideas for Christchurch's Cathedral Square prove popular with public
Dramatic changes unveiled will reshape Christchurch's Cathedral Square
No timeframe for delayed Cathedral Square plan

A council spokeswoman said staff held a pre-application meeting with Chamberlain's architect and engineer, but the council had not received consent applications.

Chamberlain said: "I am annoyed that after seven years of insurance wrangles, now settled, I now have to do battle with the council, who I believe are quite happy to drag things out with paperwork," he said.

The council spokeswoman said the Old Post Office building was listed as a group one, or highly significant, heritage item in the District Plan. It had category one registration with Heritage New Zealand.

"The District Plan requires resource consent to be obtained for any demolition, partial demolition or alterations to group one buildings."

Council staff had worked with Chamberlain and his consultants to "facilitate a positive outcome" to keep the "very important heritage building", she said.

The building formed a "key part of the south-western side of Cathedral Square", she said.

"Advice has been provided on resource consent and building consent requirements and options for sources of grant funding from the council and other organisations."

Before Christmas, it was revealed Regenerate Christchurch had spent $867,713 "creating a draft concept, engaging widely, developing the design further and drafting the regeneration strategy" for the square.

At the time, Chamberlain, who also owns the former Warner's Hotel site, said he was "disappointed with progress in the Square".

Regenerate Christchurch had hoped to have recommendations in a draft Cathedral Square strategy to the city council and Greater Christchurch Regeneration Minister Megan Woods before Christmas, but this was delayed.

The organisation now hoped to brief the council and Woods on "the recommendations, updated concept and all other elements of the draft strategy" as soon as possible this year.


April 2016: Joint Crown-council Cathedral Square development, costing $9.2 million and due for completion early 2017, put on hold.

November 2016: Regenerate Christchurch promises to start planning revamped Cathedral Square in early 2017.

January 2017: City council agrees to work with Regenerate Christchurch to develop strategy for Square redevelopment by June.

June 2017: Regenerate Christchurch says it needs more time to consult property owners and the public on regeneration strategy.

August 2017: Green spaces, no through traffic, areas for public events and spaces for young people among key aspects of Cathedral Square draft plan.

August 2017: Regenerate says it hopes to have regeneration strategy ready by late October.

September 2017: The Anglican's governing body, the Synod, votes to restore the Christ Church Cathedral.

December 2017: Regenerate says it will not have recommendations in draft strategy to the council and Greater Christchurch Regeneration Minister before Christmas, as hoped.

 - Stuff


 8)  Our Own Intrepid Roving Reporter Does His Own Under-Cover Work - A Pictorial Synopsis ( December, 2017 )


'Where have all the people gone?" - And why?

Southshore and South Brighton ( about 1.5km from South Brighton Holiday Park); neglected Roads deliberately left to return to their original pristine state!

Southshore/South Brighton - Driveways to nowhere, but where are the people now!



 Returning it back to the Environment - Agenda 21


Nice views - the seagulls, oyster-catchers, godwits, penguins will be able to flourish in peace without human pollution!

Room with a view - for the birds, rats and ferrets ( do we have Ferrets in New Zealand?), and one vacant seat.


8b)  New Brighton Rd -Deja vu

 Nice new New Brighton Road and footpath, but where are the people? A convenient open drain to cope with 'flooding'?

523 New Brighton Road -  My Home's disappeared and my Alstromerias!

 Lots of spraying with herbicides going on here - hope the cows don't use it for grazing!

 The open canal - a new hazard for wandering unattened children - fencing required at least. Please Note OSH!

 Nice new road and footpath with their own canal! (ducks, geese and the occasional seagull the new residents of this neighborhood)

 Drain -More Like A Canal.  Are they expecting some serious flooding in 2018?



Pre-Earthquake flooding New Brighton Rd., not uncommon

[26 May, 2010]





 Rising Sea Levels And Inundating Coastlines


Sea levels are not rising and coastlines are not receding, sand dunes are not disappearing, certainly not since I visited this coastline some 68 years ago - enjoying this wonderful coastline as this panoramic video filmed last December, 2017 on one of those sand dunes in South Brighton, shows.


 Sand dunes South Brighton looking towards New Brighton

 Sand Dunes South Brighton looking towards Banks Peninsula


Sand dunes South Brighton looking towards Sumner and Banks Peninsula

Descending from top of sand dunes South Brighton


Sand Dunes along Canterbury Eastern Coastline doing what they have always been doing inspite of all the environmental /climate scaremongering, at least since I was knee high to a grasshopper!

Top of the sand dunes approx. 25 feet - South New Brighton, Christchurch, N.Z. looking westwards towards Christchurch CBD


Sand dunes looking towards Southern Alps and Kaikoura coastline on far right horizon


Looking South/Southeast towards Port Hills from South Brighton sand dunes ( 25 feet elevation approx.)



 Catching Them Out With Their Lies - Using Spurious Data To Achieve Their Ends



Blowing the Lies ( Climate Change Scaremongering) Sky High, with a lot of collateral damage in the process!

"This is a catastrophe! If the general public ever gets to hear of Monckton's paper, there'll be hell to pay for all of us!" - Prof. David Richardson, Vice-Chancellor, East Anglia University (August, 2017), after reading Monckton's paper.

The "all of us," of course includes the likes of the Communist Christchurch City Council, its hangers-ons like the current Mayor of Christchurch, Lianne Dalziell, including past mayor whatshisname Bob ParkerT&T, and its now redundant and worthless report not worth the paper its written on, unlike Monckton's blockbuster mathematical treatise about to sink all these climate frauds; all those other liberals, like Dr. Ian Wright, Geo Tech Adviser, C.C.C., Dr. Deirdre Hart, Lecturer Coastal "Science", Univ. of Canty., N.I.W.A. ( well known for fudging the numbers!)- Dr James Renwick - Professor of Physical Geography at Victoria University,  I.P.C.C. and its parent body, the Communist United Nations,   Al Gore - Hollywood Sci-Fi Film Maker.


  The 'New Religion' - Climate Change

 I could go on ad nauseum, however let's not forget the 'Green' Environmental antipope, Francis, the leader of the non-Catholic apostate Vatican II sect currently ensconced in Rome today as we attempt to catalogue this unhappy gaggle of unfortunate disillusionists!

 12 Things Pagans Should Know About the Pope's ...

 The Green Antipope - Stopping Climate Change -Yeah, Right!

Getting Behind Pope Francis on Climate Change: Why People ...

Antipope Frank treads where angels fear to tread, and shortly joins that unhappy mob when Monckton's paper get out amongst the masses, when there will 'as sure as God made little apples', be 'Hell to Pay'!


That "Hell To Pay" Video By Lord Christopher Monckton:




It Took A Little Mathematics To Discover Their (Communist) Error! 






Christchurch Residents 1.  Communist Christchurch City Council 0



MHFM: Letter of the Week 17 January, 2018 (E-Exchanges Comments Section).


Abomination: Vatican Issues Stamp Of Heretic Martin Luther!


The Netflix movie about Luther shows the heretic, Luther-supporter, Timothy Dolan pleasurably animating Luther’s hate, disgust and embarrassment for the One Holy and Apostolic Church. Like Luther, Dolan is an extremist and a heretic who is brainwashed and thereby led into mortal sin by the teachings of Luther via Vatican II Rome, that he believes to be the Roman Catholic Church of Christ. These and other heresies start from Rome and run down into the seminaries where they are then taught in the parish churches and schools throughout the world. 

The “new, young, traditional priests” that are being sold to “conservative Catholics” are other Luthers. They should be tested by the “faithful” but how can they test them when they don’t know enough truth themselves?


How can a billion “Catholics” be so deceived? They can when they don’t know the dogmas of the Faith. How can that be possible? It can be when they refuse to acknowledge their ignorance and study the Doctrines of the Faith and research the encyclicals and teachings of anything that comes BEFORE Vatican II… Because they have been indoctrinated ONLY in the teachings of Vatican II...


Jane Todd



Recommended links:


Two Little Dickie Birds-wednesday-31.html


Episode 2 -The Truth About Cancer



New Zealand Endangered Bird Species In Water Color